ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Intelligent Evaluation Algorithm of English Writing Based on Semantic Analysis.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to solve the intelligent evaluation of English writing, this paper proposes a method based on the English semantic neural network algorithm. This paper first briefly analyzes the research background of the English semantic analysis system, then expounds on the relevant technologies of the English distance similarity algorithm, semantic analysis intelligent algorithm structure, word analysis algorithm, sentence part of speech analysis algorithm, sentence semantic analysis algorithm, and neural network algorithm, and finally expounds the database and method implementation of the English semantic analysis system, so as to provide guarantee for the design of the English semantic analysis system. The experimental results show that the recognition accuracy of the BRF network for English characters can reach 96.35%, which is 7.79% higher than that of the BP network; the AUC of the BRF network reaches 0.89, which is closer to 1 compared with 0.72 of the BP network. The test results are in good agreement with the antinoise curve test results of the figure. It is proved that the English semantic neural network algorithm can effectively improve the accuracy of English translation and further improve the efficiency of the system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.