Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248924›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Semantic Sentiment Classification for COVID-19 Tweets Using Universal Sentence Encoder.

Ibrahim Eldesouky Fattoh, Fahad Kamal Alsheref, Waleed M Ead, Ahmed Mohamed Youssef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ibrahim Eldesouky FattohComputer Science Department, Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1106-1549
Fahad Kamal AlsherefInformation Systems Department, Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-9583
Waleed M EadInformation Systems Department, Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2969-2269
Ahmed Mohamed YoussefFaculty of Education, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1159-6631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of data on the web has increased in the last twenty years. One of the reasons is the appearance of social media. The data on social sites describe many real-life events in our daily lives. In the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, a lot of people and media organizations were writing and documenting their health status and the latest news about the coronavirus on social media. Using these tweets (sentiments) about the coronavirus and analyzing them in a computational model can help decision makers in measuring public opinion and yielding remarkable findings. In this research article, we introduce a deep learning sentiment analysis model based on Universal Sentence Encoder. The dataset used in this research was collected from Twitter, and it was classified as positive, neutral, and negative. The sentence embedding model determines the meaning of word sequences instead of individual words. The model divides the dataset into training and testing and depends on the sentence similarity in detecting sentiment class. The obtained accuracy results reached 78.062%, and this result outperforms many traditional ML classifiers based on TF-IDF applied on the same dataset and another model based on the CNN classifier.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaHumansPandemicsSemanticsSentiment Analysis

Identifiers

PMID36248924
PMCPMC9556213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.