Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248919›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

A Hybrid Catheter Localisation Framework in Echocardiography Based on Electromagnetic Tracking and Deep Learning Segmentation.

Fei Jia, Shu Wang, V T Pham

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fei JiaFaculty of Natural, Mathematical and Engineering Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Shu WangFaculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4952-218X
V T PhamSaigon University, Hochiminh, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-8441
King's College London · GBSaigon University · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventional cardiology procedure is an important type of minimally invasive surgery that deals with the catheter-based treatment of cardiovascular diseases, such as coronary artery diseases, strokes, peripheral arterial diseases, and aortic diseases. Ultrasound imaging, also called echocardiography, is a typical imaging tool that monitors catheter puncturing. Localising a medical device accurately during cardiac interventions can help improve the procedure's safety and reliability under ultrasound imaging. However, external device tracking and image-based tracking methods can only provide a partial solution. Thus, we proposed a hybrid framework, with the combination of both methods to localise the catheter tip target in an automatic way. The external device used was an electromagnetic tracking system from North Digital Inc (NDI), and the ultrasound image analysis was based on UNet, a deep learning network for semantic segmentation. From the external method, the tip's location was determined precisely, and the deep learning platform segmented the exact catheter tip automatically. This novel hybrid localisation framework combines the advantages of external electromagnetic (EM) tracking and the deep learning-based image method, which offers a new solution to identify the moving medical device in low-resolution ultrasound images.

Indexed as

Deep LearningCathetersEchocardiographyElectromagnetic PhenomenaReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID36248919
PMCPMC9560838
OpenAlexW4302304546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.