Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248767›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023

Key lessons from the COVID-19 public health response in Australia.

J M Basseal, C M Bennett, P Collignon, B J Currie, D N Durrheim, J Leask, E S McBryde, P McIntyre, F M Russell, D W Smith and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Planning and Implementing Social Media Communication in a Public Health Crisis: An Analytical Perspective.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Widening the lens for pandemic preparedness: children must be seenThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

J M BassealSydney Infectious Diseases Institute (Sydney ID), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
C M BennettInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
P CollignonMedical School, Australian National University and Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.
B J CurrieMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
D N DurrheimDepartment of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
J LeaskSydney Infectious Diseases Institute (Sydney ID), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
E S McBrydeAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
P McIntyreDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
F M RussellDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
D W SmithSchool of Medicine, University of Western Australia and PathWest Department of Microbiology, Perth, Australia.
T C SorrellSydney Infectious Diseases Institute (Sydney ID), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
B J MaraisSydney Infectious Diseases Institute (Sydney ID), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Australia avoided the worst effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, but still experienced many negative impacts. Reflecting on lessons from Australia's public health response, an Australian expert panel composed of relevant discipline experts identified the following key lessons: 1) movement restrictions were effective, but their implementation requires careful consideration of adverse impacts, 2) disease modelling was valuable, but its limitations should be acknowledged, 3) the absence of timely national data requires re-assessment of national surveillance structures, 4) the utility of advanced pathogen genomics and novel vaccine technology was clearly demonstrated, 5) decision-making that is evidence informed and consultative is essential to maintain trust, 6) major system weaknesses in the residential aged-care sector require fixing, 7) adequate infection prevention and control frameworks are critically important, 8) the interests and needs of young people should not be compromised, 9) epidemics should be recognised as a 'standing threat', 10) regional and global solidarity is important. It should be acknowledged that we were unable to capture all relevant nuances and context specific differences. However, the intent of this review of Australia's public health response is to critically reflect on key lessons learnt and to encourage constructive national discussion in countries across the Western Pacific Region.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical reflectionsLessons learntPandemic

Identifiers

PMID36248767
PMCPMC9549254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.