Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248752›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2022

The Influence of Screening Mammography Cessation and Resumption on Breast Cancer Presentation and Treatment: A Multi-Hospital Health System Experience During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.

Holly Mason, Ann-Kristin Friedrich, Shiva Niakan, Danielle Jacobbe, Jesse Casaubon, Aixa Pérez Coulter

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Holly MasonDepartment of Surgery, UMass Chan Medical School-Baystate, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4707-5547
Ann-Kristin FriedrichDepartment of Surgery, UMass Chan Medical School-Baystate, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0661-9379
Shiva NiakanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UMass Chan Medical School-Baystate, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2402-8943
Danielle JacobbeThe Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1256-6322
Jesse CasaubonDepartment of Surgery, UMass Chan Medical School-Baystate, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0547-7989
Aixa Pérez CoulterDepartment of Surgery, UMass Chan Medical School-Baystate, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9707-2267
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USBaystate Medical Center · USCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic screening restrictions on the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in a single health system. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective, cohort investigation of breast cancer patients at a multi-institution health system from March 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020 with two time periods related to the pandemic: "Early phase" (March 18 - June 7) reflecting the time of the screening mammography moratorium and "Late phase" (June 8 - December 31) to reflect the time once screening mammography resumed. 2020 was compared to 2019 to exclude potential differences from temporal or seasonal changes. Variables included demographics, COVID related-deferral, cancer specific data, method of detection, type of treatment recommended and received. Results: Fewer patients presented with a breast cancer diagnosis during Early phase 2020 when compared to any other time period. Numbers increased significantly in Late phase 2020; total numbers of patients seen in 2020 approached but did not completely reach that of 2019. When compared to other time periods, patients who presented during the moratorium on screening were younger, more likely to be black, had a higher Body Mass Index, and were more likely to have a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive tumor. There was a slight increase in size of presenting tumor and node positivity, although no differences in breast or axillary surgical management were identified. Conclusion: Despite an increase in tumor size and positive nodal status seen during the screening moratorium, surgical treatment was not negatively impacted.

Indexed as

Breast cancerCOVID-19neoadjuvant systemic therapysurgery

Identifiers

PMID36248752
PMCPMC9521286
OpenAlexW4297534169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.