Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248750›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2022

Pure Mucinous Breast Carcinoma With a Favorable Tumor Biology and Clinical Outcomes.

Selman Emiroglu, Mustafa Tukenmez, Seyma Karakus, Hasan Karanlik, Semen Onder, Vahit Ozmen, Neslihan Cabioglu, Enver Ozkurt, Ravza Yilmaz, Mahmut Muslumanoglu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Power of MUC2 in Mucinous Adenocarcinomas.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Selman EmirogluDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-6926
Mustafa TukenmezDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9403-568X
Seyma KarakusDepartment of General Surgery, Liv Hospital Vadi Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hasan KaranlikSurgical Oncology Unit, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-7260
Semen OnderDepartment of Pathology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1384-630X
Vahit OzmenDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2973-8247
Neslihan CabiogluDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0989-7411
Enver OzkurtGeneral Surgery, Ozel Basari Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-3119
Ravza YilmazDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8661-6751
Mahmut MuslumanogluDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0279-5671
Liv Hospital · TRIstanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: A few studies suggest that mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare breast carcinoma with good prognostic features. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate biological features and clinicopathological characteristics of pure mucinous breast carcinoma (PMBC) to determine clinical outcome in PMBC. Materials and Methods: The data of 87 patients diagnosed with PMBC between November 2004 and February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of clinicopathological and demographic characteristics, management, and outcome. Results: The majority of the patients in this study were female, with a median (range) age of 63 (28-90) years. Out of 87 patients, 60 had breast conserving surgery, 27 had a mastectomy, 58 had sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and 24 had axillary dissection due to a positive SLNB or clinical axilla. Due to age and comorbidities, five patients were not suitable for axillary surgery. The median largest tumor diameter was 23 (5-100) mm. Only 23 patients (26.4%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas almost all patients received hormone therapy. The median duration of follow-up was 53 (6-207) months. There was no local or systemic recurrence in any of the patients. Only 10 patients (11.5%) died from non-cancer causes during the follow-up and treatment period. In this study, tumor diameter was significantly higher in grade II/III tumors ( Conclusion: In this study, the majority of patients were in the luminal subgroups with excellent prognosis and low incidences of lymph node metastasis. As a result, PMBC has favorable tumor biology. We believe that minimal axillary surgery would be the most appropriate approach during patient treatment, due to the low rate of lymph node involvement and favorable prognosis in PMBC patients.

Indexed as

molecular subtypeMucinous carcinomaprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36248750
PMCPMC9521282
OpenAlexW4297534119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.