Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248721›Full record

ArticleJournal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences2022

Intrinsic Dimensionality as a Metric for the Impact of Mission Design Parameters.

K Cawse-Nicholson, A M Raiho, D R Thompson, G C Hulley, C E Miller, K R Miner, B Poulter, D Schimel, F D Schneider, P A Townsend and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Intrinsic Dimensionality as a Metric for the Impact of Mission Design Parameters.Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

K Cawse-NicholsonJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-4066
A M RaihoNASA Goddard Space Flight Center Biospheric Sciences Lab Greenbelt MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2552-3399
D R ThompsonJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1100-7550
G C HulleyJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3266-179X
C E MillerJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9380-4838
K R MinerJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA.
B PoulterNASA Goddard Space Flight Center Biospheric Sciences Lab Greenbelt MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9493-8600
D SchimelJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA.
F D SchneiderJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA.
P A TownsendJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-8774
S K ZarehJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution space-based spectral imaging of the Earth's surface delivers critical information for monitoring changes in the Earth system as well as resource management and utilization. Orbiting spectrometers are built according to multiple design parameters, including ground sampling distance (GSD), spectral resolution, temporal resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio. Different applications drive divergent instrument designs, so optimization for wide-reaching missions is complex. The Surface Biology and Geology component of NASA's Earth System Observatory addresses science questions and meets applications needs across diverse fields, including terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, natural disasters, and the cryosphere. The algorithms required to generate the geophysical variables from the observed spectral imagery each have their own inherent dependencies and sensitivities, and weighting these objectively is challenging. Here, we introduce intrinsic dimensionality (ID), a measure of information content, as an applications-agnostic, data-driven metric to quantify performance sensitivity to various design parameters. ID is computed through the analysis of the eigenvalues of the image covariance matrix, and can be thought of as the number of significant principal components. This metric is extremely powerful for quantifying the information content in high-dimensional data, such as spectrally resolved radiances and their changes over space and time. We find that the ID decreases for coarser GSD, decreased spectral resolution and range, less frequent acquisitions, and lower signal-to-noise levels. This decrease in information content has implications for all derived products. ID is simple to compute, providing a single quantitative standard to evaluate combinations of design parameters, irrespective of higher-level algorithms, products, applications, or disciplines.

Indexed as

hyperspectralimaging spectroscopyintrinsic dimensionalitymission designsurface biology and geology

Identifiers

PMID36248721
PMCPMC9539474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.