ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Evaluating the use of synthetic T1-w images in new T2 lesion detection in multiple sclerosis.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning based algorithms for virtual early detection and screening of neurodegenerative and neurocognitive disorders: a systematic-review.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Gadolinium-Sparing Detection of Active Multiple Sclerosis Lesions: A Structured Narrative Review.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Performances of experts and automated methods on new multiple sclerosis lesions detection: insights from the MSSeg2 challenge.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pioneering new paths: the role of generative modelling in neurological disease research.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Review
- The role of AI for MRI-analysis in multiple sclerosis-A brief overview.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of disease activity using serial brain MRI scans is one of the most valuable strategies for monitoring treatment response in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving disease-modifying treatments. Recently, several deep learning approaches have been proposed to improve this analysis, obtaining a good trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, especially when using T1-w and T2-FLAIR images as inputs. However, the need to acquire two different types of images is time-consuming, costly and not always available in clinical practice. In this paper, we investigate an approach to generate synthetic T1-w images from T2-FLAIR images and subsequently analyse the impact of using original and synthetic T1-w images on the performance of a state-of-the-art approach for longitudinal MS lesion detection. We evaluate our approach on a dataset containing 136 images from MS patients, and 73 images with lesion activity (the appearance of new T2 lesions in follow-up scans). To evaluate the synthesis of the images, we analyse the structural similarity index metric and the median absolute error and obtain consistent results. To study the impact of synthetic T1-w images, we evaluate the performance of the new lesion detection approach when using (1) both T2-FLAIR and T1-w original images, (2) only T2-FLAIR images, and (3) both T2-FLAIR and synthetic T1-w images. Sensitivities of 0.75, 0.63, and 0.81, respectively, were obtained at the same false-positive rate (0.14) for all experiments. In addition, we also present the results obtained when using the data from the international MSSEG-2 challenge, showing also an improvement when including synthetic T1-w images. In conclusion, we show that the use of synthetic images can support the lack of data or even be used instead of the original image to homogenize the contrast of the different acquisitions in new T2 lesions detection algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.