SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Efficacy of nGVS to improve postural stability in people with bilateral vestibulopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Depth Sensor-Based Instrumentation of the Fukuda Stepping Test: Reliability and Clinical Associations in Older Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Standardizing Stimulus Parameters for Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation.Journal of audiology & otology · 2026Review
- Altered Body Composition in Dizziness and Vestibular Dysfunction: Insights From the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Review
- A wide-ranging review of galvanic vestibular stimulation: from its genesis to basic science and clinical applications.Experimental brain research · 2025Review
- Optimizing noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) for postural control: methodological considerations when individualizing the signal for people with bilateral vestibulopathy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Mechanisms underlying treatment effects of vestibular noise stimulation on postural instability in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Cognition in vestibular disorders: state of the field, challenges, and priorities for the future.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- A mobile electrical stimulator for therapeutic modulation of the vestibular system - design, safety, and functionality.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Individualized Vibrotactile Neurofeedback Training in Patients with Chronic Bilateral Vestibulopathy.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Scoping out noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation: a review of the parameters used to improve postural control.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation applied at the onset of stance on muscular activity and gait cycle duration in healthy individuals.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) has been used to boost vestibular afferent information to the central nervous system. This has the potential to improve postural control for people for whom vestibular signals are weak, such as in bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the evidence for nGVS as a modality to improve postural control in people with BVP. Methods: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted of five databases up to July 2022 to find studies applying nGVS to people with BVP, with the aim of improving postural control. Two independent reviewers screened and identified eligible studies, completed a risk of bias evaluation (Cochrane) and extracted relevant data. The standardized mean difference (SMD) based on Hedges' g was calculated as a measure of effect size for the primary outcome measure that best identified postural control, and a forest plot generated. Results: Seven studies met the eligibility criteria, with five being suitable for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed a moderate effect in favor of nGVS improving postural control during standing and walking [pooled SMD = 0.47 95% CI (0.25, 0.7)]. nGVS-mediated improvements in postural control were most evident in observations of reduced sway velocity when standing on a firm surface with eyes closed, and in the reduced variability of gait parameters, particularly those measuring lateral stability. Conclusions: Coincident nGVS in people with BVP improves postural control during standing and walking. This improvement appears to be context specific, in that vestibular augmentation is most effective in situations where visual inputs are limited, and where reliable context specific proprioceptive cues are available. Further research is warranted investigating additional circumstances in which nGVS improves postural control, including investigating the residual, and sustained effects of nGVS. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=342147, identifier: 342147.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.