ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Structural changes in the retina after implantation of subretinal three-dimensional implants in mini pigs.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Progress in Photoreceptor Cell-Based Therapy for Degenerative Retinal Disease.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Review
- Pig Models in Retinal Research and Retinal Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024Review
- Focal stimulation of retinal ganglion cells using subretinal 3D microelectrodes with peripheral electrodes of opposite current.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Article
- Retinal Prostheses: Engineering and Clinical Perspectives for Vision Restoration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The retinal structural changes after subretinal implantation of three-dimensional (3D) microelectrodes were investigated in a mini pig. Three types of electrode were implanted into the subretinal spaces of nine mini pigs: 75-μm-high 3D electrodes on a 200-μm-thick right-angled polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate (group 1); a 140-μm-thick sloped PDMS substrate without electrodes (group 2); and a 140-μm-thick sloped PDMS substrate with 20-μm-high 3D electrodes (group 3). One mini pig was used as a control. Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) images were obtained at baseline and 2, 6, and 12 weeks post-surgery. Retinal specimens were immunostained using a tissue-clearing method 3 months post-implantation. The 75-μm-high 3D electrodes progressively penetrated the inner nuclear layer (INL) and touched the inner plexiform layer (IPL) 2 weeks post-surgery. At 6 weeks post-operatively, the electrodes were in contact with the nerve-fiber layer, accompanied by a severe fibrous reaction. In the other groups, the implants remained in place without subretinal migration. Immunostaining showed that retinal ganglion and bipolar cells were preserved without fibrosis over the retinal implants in groups 2 and 3 during the 12-week implantation period. In summary, SD-OCT and immunohistology results showed differences in the extent of reactions, such as fibrosis over the implants and penetration of the electrodes into the inner retinal layer depending on different types of electrodes. A sloped substrate performed better than a right-angled substrate in terms of retinal preservation over the implanted electrodes. The 20-μm-high electrodes showed better structural compatibility than the 75-μm-high 3D electrodes. There was no significant difference between the results of sloped implants without electrodes and 20-μm-high 3D electrodes, indicating that the latter had no adverse effects on retinal tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.