Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248373›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Prognostic value of glucose to lymphocyte ratio for patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy: A multi-institutional, propensity score matching cohort study.

Jinliang Ni, Ziye Li, Wei Song, Houliang Zhang, Yidi Wang, Yifan Zhang, Haipeng Zhang, Guangcan Yang, Jun Xie, Keyi Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating the prognostic role of glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first line: a study by the Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jinliang NiDepartment of Urology, Shidong Hospital of Yangpu District, Shanghai, China.
Ziye LiShanghai Clinical College, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wei SongDepartment of Urology, Shidong Hospital of Yangpu District, Shanghai, China.
Houliang ZhangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Yidi WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Yifan ZhangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Haipeng ZhangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Guangcan YangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Jun XieDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Keyi WangDepartment of Urology, Shidong Hospital of Yangpu District, Shanghai, China.
Bo PengDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Weipu MaoDepartment of Urology, Shidong Hospital of Yangpu District, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNTongji University · CNZhongda Hospital Southeast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the prognostic value of preoperative blood glucose to lymphocyte ratio (GLR) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy through a multi-institutional clinical study. Methods: A total of 420 patients with RCC from three medical centers from 2014 to 2019 were included in this study. The effect of GLR on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in RCC patients was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Moreover, a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis of different GLR groups was utilized to further confirm the prognostic ability of GLR. Results: The optimal cut-off value for GLR was 6.8. Patients were divided into high GLR and low GLR groups according to the optimal cut-off value. GLR was significant association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and AJCC stage. High GLR predicted adverse OS ( Conclusions: High GLR is associated with adverse prognosis in RCC patients, and GLR can serve as an independent prognostic marker for OS and CSS in RCC patients receiving laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Indexed as

cancer-specific survivalglucose to lymphocyte ratiooverall survivalprognosisrenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36248373
PMCPMC9556963
OpenAlexW4298003682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.