Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248184›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of soil science

Grazing and topography control nutrient pools in low Arctic soils of Southwest Greenland.

Maud A J van Soest, N John Anderson, Roland Bol, Liz R Dixon, Philip M Haygarth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of soil science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maud A J van SoestGeography & Environment Loughborough University Loughborough UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4656-515X
N John AndersonGeography & Environment Loughborough University Loughborough UK.
Roland BolInstitute of Bio and Geosciences, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich Germany.
Liz R DixonRothamsted Research, North Wyke Okehampton UK.
Philip M HaygarthLancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-6290

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C504919/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil nutrient pools in the dry low Arctic are likely to be released under climatic change and this bioavailability has the potential to increase both terrestrial and aquatic productions. As well as the direct effect of warming, external disturbances such as nutrient deposition and grazing can also drive ecosystem change. This study in the low Arctic Kangerlussuaq area of southwest Greenland compared soil nutrient pools in terms of both topographic position on a catena and by soil depth in two small catchments with contrasting muskox abundance. We tested the hypotheses that there were differences between soil carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) across a soil catena (ridge - slope - valley) and by soil depth (litter - 0-5 cm - 25-30 cm) for the two sites (SS17b, muskox present, versus - SS85, no muskox). Total C and N concentrations of soils were on average lower at SS17b compared to SS85. Moreover, the soil N concentration increased downslope in the catena with higher amounts in the valleys compared to the slopes and ridges. Soil P concentration (0.70 g P kg Highlights: Soil nutrient pools in two low-arctic catchments in Greenland were compared.Grazing and dung inputs by muskox affect soil nutrient pools in Greenland.Soil P stores in Kangerlussuaq are similar to intensively managed farmland in Europe.The heterogeneity of arctic landscapes and need for ecosystem-specific research are emphasised.

Indexed as

carbonmuskoxnitrogennutrientsphosphorus

Identifiers

PMID36248184
PMCPMC9541922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.