ArticleBrain & spine2022
Surgeon's comfort: The ergonomics of a robotic exoscope using a head-mounted display.
Article in Brain & spine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exoscope versus microscope in spine surgery: A meta-analysis based on procedure-specific subgroup analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Evidence-based ergonomic parameters for safer surgical practice: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Extended reality in skull base surgery: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Comment on: Performance and adaptability comparison between medical students and experienced neurosurgeons using a robotic exoscope with a head-mounted display.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Exoscope-Assisted Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review From Basic to Complex Pathologies.Cureus · 2025Review
- Performance and adaptability comparison between medical students and experienced neurosurgeons using a robotic exoscope with a head-mounted display.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Exoscopic Transoral Supraglottic Laryngectomy.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
- Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Spine Surgeons.Global spine journal · 2024Article
- Cadaveric study of ergonomics and performance using a robotic exoscope with a head-mounted display in spine surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Assessment of head-mounted display for exoscopic neurosurgery.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- Exoscope-assisted temporal bone resection: operative videos of the lateral and total techniques.Neurosurgical focus: Video · 2024Article
- Narrative review of patient-specific 3D visualization and reality technologies in skull base neurosurgery: enhancements in surgical training, planning, and navigation.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- RoboticScope-Assisted Microanastomosis in a Chicken Leg Model.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Implementation of a three-dimensional (3D) robotic digital microscope (AEOS) in spinal procedures.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Visualization, navigation, augmentation. The ever-changing perspective of the neurosurgeon.Brain & spine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Conventional microscopes have certain limitations in terms of posture and ergonomics. Monitor-based exoscopes could solve this problem and thereby lead to less work-related sick leave for surgeons. Research question: The aim of this study was to assess the ergonomics, usability, and neurosurgeon's comfort of a novel three-dimensional head-mounted display-based exoscope in a standardized setting. Material & Methods: 34 neurosurgeons participated in a workshop on the exoscope, which features a head-mounted display and a head gesture-triggered control panel. After completion of a custom-made 10-step microsurgical exercise, image quality and comfort were assessed using a questionnaire. The participants' posture during the exercise was analyzed using a video motion analysis software. Results: 34 participants (median neurosurgical experience: 6 years) were included. The median time to complete the exercise was 12 min [IqR 9.4, 15.0]. Younger participants (p = 0.005) and those with video game experience (p = 0.03) had a significantly steeper learning curve. The median overall satisfaction was at 80% in general and 82% for image quality. The median upper body as well as the median head coronal displacement from the neutral axis were 0°. Participants with less microsurgical experience showed less head/body displacement during the exercise (p = 0.01). Discussion and conclusion: Using the microsurgical training tool, we were able to depict a steep learning curve with a sufficient learnability of the most relevant commands. The exoscope excelled in usability, image quality as well as in ergonomic and favorable posture and could thus become an alternative to conventional microscopes due to the potentially elevated surgeons' comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.