Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248127›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2022

Surgeon's comfort: The ergonomics of a robotic exoscope using a head-mounted display.

Anto Abramovic, Matthias Demetz, Aleksandrs Krigers, Marlies Bauer, Sara Lener, Daniel Pinggera, Johannes Kerschbaumer, Sebastian Hartmann, Helga Fritsch, Claudius Thomé and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anto AbramovicDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Matthias DemetzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Aleksandrs KrigersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Marlies BauerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sara LenerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Daniel PinggeraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Johannes KerschbaumerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sebastian HartmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Helga FritschDivision of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Müllerstr. 59, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Claudius ThoméDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian F FreyschlagDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional microscopes have certain limitations in terms of posture and ergonomics. Monitor-based exoscopes could solve this problem and thereby lead to less work-related sick leave for surgeons. Research question: The aim of this study was to assess the ergonomics, usability, and neurosurgeon's comfort of a novel three-dimensional head-mounted display-based exoscope in a standardized setting. Material & Methods: 34 neurosurgeons participated in a workshop on the exoscope, which features a head-mounted display and a head gesture-triggered control panel. After completion of a custom-made 10-step microsurgical exercise, image quality and comfort were assessed using a questionnaire. The participants' posture during the exercise was analyzed using a video motion analysis software. Results: 34 participants (median neurosurgical experience: 6 years) were included. The median time to complete the exercise was 12 ​min [IqR 9.4, 15.0]. Younger participants (p ​= ​0.005) and those with video game experience (p ​= ​0.03) had a significantly steeper learning curve. The median overall satisfaction was at 80% in general and 82% for image quality. The median upper body as well as the median head coronal displacement from the neutral axis were 0°. Participants with less microsurgical experience showed less head/body displacement during the exercise (p ​= ​0.01). Discussion and conclusion: Using the microsurgical training tool, we were able to depict a steep learning curve with a sufficient learnability of the most relevant commands. The exoscope excelled in usability, image quality as well as in ergonomic and favorable posture and could thus become an alternative to conventional microscopes due to the potentially elevated surgeons' comfort.

Indexed as

ExoscopeMicroscopeMicrosurgeryNeurosurgeryRoboticsSurgeons' ergonomics

Identifiers

PMID36248127
PMCPMC9560643
OpenAlexW4200433180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.