Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248124›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2022

Management of cavernous sinus meningiomas: Consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Marco V Corniola, Pierre-Hugues Roche, Michaël Bruneau, Luigi M Cavallo, Roy T Daniel, Mahmoud Messerer, Sebastien Froelich, Paul A Gardner, Fred Gentili, Takeshi Kawase and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Patency of the Cavernous Sinus After Medial Wall Resection: An Observational Study.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Giant Meningiomas Invading the Cavernous Sinus: The "Inevitable Ones".Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Marco V CorniolaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes/Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Pierre-Hugues RocheService de Neurochirurgie, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Michaël BruneauDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium.
Luigi M CavalloDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Università Degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Roy T DanielDepartment of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mahmoud MessererDepartment of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sebastien FroelichService de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, APHP Nord, Paris, France.
Paul A GardnerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Fred GentiliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Takeshi KawaseDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Dimitrios ParaskevopoulosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, St. Bartholomew's and the Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Jean RégisDepartment of Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Henry W S SchroederDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany.
Theodore H SchwartzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA.
Marc SindouUniversity of Lyon, France.
Jan F CorneliusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marcos TatagibaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Uniklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Torstein R MelingFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The evolution of cavernous sinus meningiomas (CSMs) might be unpredictable and the efficacy of their treatments is challenging due to their indolent evolution, variations and fluctuations of symptoms, heterogeneity of classifications and lack of randomized controlled trials. Here, a dedicated task force provides a consensus statement on the overall management of CSMs. Research question: To determine the best overall management of CSMs, depending on their clinical presentation, size, and evolution as well as patient characteristics. Material and methods: Using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we included literature from January 2000 to December 2020. A total of 400 abstracts and 77 titles were kept for full-paper screening. Results: The task force formulated 8 recommendations (Level C evidence). CSMs should be managed by a highly specialized multidisciplinary team. The initial evaluation of patients includes clinical, ophthalmological, endocrinological and radiological assessment. Treatment of CSM should involve experienced skull-base neurosurgeons or neuro-radiosurgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists, ophthalmologists, and endocrinologists. Discussion and conclusion: Radiosurgery is preferred as first-line treatment in small, enclosed, pauci-symptomatic lesions/in elderly patients, while large CSMs not amenable to resection or WHO grade II-III are candidates for radiotherapy. Microsurgery is an option in aggressive/rapidly progressing lesions in young patients presenting with oculomotor/visual/endocrinological impairment. Whenever surgery is offered, open cranial approaches are the current standard. There is limited experience reported about endoscopic endonasal approach for CSMs and the main indication is decompression of the cavernous sinus to improve symptoms. Whenever surgery is indicated, the current trend is to offer decompression followed by radiosurgery.

Indexed as

Cavernous sinusConsensus statementCranial nervesGammaknifeGross total resectionIntracranial meningiomasMeningiomaMicrosurgeryNeurosurgeryPituitaryRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36248124
PMCPMC9560706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.