Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248113›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2022

Assessment of patients with a Chiari malformation type I.

Sharon Ka Po Tam, Jonathan Chia, Andrew Brodbelt, Mansoor Foroughi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intraoperative ultrasonography in the surgical management of Chiari I malformation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and applications.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Impacts of type 1 Chiari malformation on elderly.Surgical neurology international · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon Ka Po TamRoyal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Jonathan ChiaRoyal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Andrew BrodbeltThe Walton Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Mansoor ForoughiRoyal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Royal Sussex County Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) has been estimated as up to 1% of the general population. The majority of patients are asymptomatic and usually do not need treatment. Symptomatic patients, and some asymptomatic patients with associated conditions, may benefit from further assessment and treatment. Research question: The aim of this review was to describe the clinical and radiological assessment of patients presenting with a CM-I. Material and methods: A literature search was performed using the PubMed and Embase databases focused on clinical assessment and imaging techniques used to diagnose CM-I. Results: Following a complete clinical evaluation in patients with symptomatic CM-I and/or radiologically significant CM-I (tonsillar impaction, resulting tonsillar asymmetry and loss of CSF spaces), MRI of the brain and whole spine enables an assessment of the CM-I and potential associated or causative conditions. These include hydrocephalus, syringomyelia, spinal dysraphism, and tethered cord. Flow and Cine MRI can provide information on CSF dynamics at the craniocervical junction, and help in surgical decision-making. Hypermobility or instability at the upper cervical and craniocervical junction is less common and can be measured with CT imaging and flexion/extension or upright MRI. Discussion and conclusion: The majority of CM-I detected are incidental findings on MRI imaging of brain or spine, and do not require intervention. Once a radiological diagnosis and concern has been raised, clinical assessment by an appropriate specialist is required. A MRI brain and cervical spine is indicated in all radiologically labelled CM-I. In symptomatic patients or cases of radiologically significant CM-I, MRI of the brain and entire spine is indicated. Further investigations should be tailored to individuals' needs.

Indexed as

Basilar invaginationChiariSyringomyeliaTethered cord

Identifiers

PMID36248113
PMCPMC9560699
OpenAlexW4200277458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.