Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248111›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2022

Neurosurgery outcomes and complications in a monocentric 7-year patient registry.

Johannes Sarnthein, Victor E Staartjes, Luca Regli, Neurosurgery-Registry consortium

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01628406 (Patient Registry of the Neurosurgery Department.), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01628406 unknown statusnot on this map

Patient Registry of the Neurosurgery Department.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2012 to 2025Enrolled18,000ConditionsPatients Treated at the Neurosurgery DepartmentArmsTreatment at the neurosurgery departement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Intraoperative MRI in pediatric brain tumor surgery: Optimizing surgical decision-making and extent of resection.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Complexity and complications.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Do we need a neurosurgical frailty index?Surgical neurology international · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johannes SarntheinDepartment of Neurosurgery and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Victor E StaartjesDepartment of Neurosurgery and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Luca RegliDepartment of Neurosurgery and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Neurosurgery-Registry consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Capturing adverse events reliably is paramount for clinical practice and research alike. In the era of "big data", prospective registries form the basis of clinical research and quality improvement. Research question: To present results of long-term implementation of a prospective patient registry, and evaluate the validity of the Clavien-Dindo grade (CDG) to classify complications in neurosurgery. Materials and methods: A prospective registry for cranial and spinal neurosurgical procedures was implemented in 2013. The CDG - a complication grading focused on need for unplanned therapeutic intervention - was used to grade complications. We assess construct validity of the CDG. Results: Data acquisition integrated into our hospital workflow permitted to include all eligible patients into the registry. We have registered 8226 patients that were treated in 11994 surgeries and 32494 consultations up until December 2020. Similarly, we have captured 1245 complications on 6308 patient discharge forms (20%) since full operational status of the registry. The majority of complications (819/6308 ​= ​13%) were treated without invasive treatment (CDG 1 or CDG 2). At discharge, there was a clear correlation of CDG and the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS, rho ​= ​-0.29, slope -7 KPS percentage points per increment of CDG) and the length of stay (rho ​= ​0.43, slope 3.2 days per increment of CDG). Discussion and conclusion: Patient registries with high completeness and objective capturing of complications are central to the process of quality improvement. The CDG demonstrates construct validity as a measure of complication classification in a neurosurgical patient population.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsMorbidity and mortality roundsQuality monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36248111
PMCPMC9560692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.