Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248101›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2022

Multidisciplinary neurosurgical rounds incorporating antimicrobial stewardship. Are they of benefit?

M Creedon, H Humphreys, R Connolly, L Gaughan, M Skally, J Caird, J Duddy, P J O'Halloran, T Mandiwanza, K Burns and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

M CreedonDepartment of Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
H HumphreysDepartment of Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
R ConnollyDepartment of Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
L GaughanDepartment of Pharmacy, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
M SkallyDepartment of Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J CairdDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J DuddyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
P J O'HalloranDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
T MandiwanzaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
K BurnsDepartment of Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
B DineshDepartment of Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
E SmythDepartment of Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
K O'ConnellDepartment of Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
F FitzpatrickDepartment of Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, appropriate antimicrobials are essential to optimise patient outcomes. In 2017, antimicrobial use prevalence (AMU) on the two neurosurgical wards in our tertiary teaching hospital varied from 23% on ward A to 33% on ward B with 67% and 100% 'appropriate' prescriptions, respectively. In July 2018, a weekly antimicrobial stewardship multidisciplinary round led by a senior neurosurgery registrar commenced, attended by the antimicrobial stewardship team (AST). Research question: This report evaluates whether a multi-disciplinary approach on neurosurgical prescribing was beneficial, specifically in reducing AMU. Materials and methods: The following data was collected on AST rounds for 30 weeks in total from August 2018 to July 2019: number of patients on antimicrobials, appropriateness and stewardship actions. A questionnaire was distributed to neurosurgical doctors on two occasions to canvass opinions and attitudes on antimicrobial prescribing. Results: 1716 prescriptions were reviewed (mean 57.2 per week). Of these 321 (18.7%) included antimicrobial prescriptions; 200 on ward A (19.8%), and 121 on ward B (17%), representing a decrease in AMU from 2017. The majority of antimicrobial prescriptions, 271 (84.4%) were deemed appropriate. Stewardship actions were taken in 215 (67%) prescriptions.Fifteen questionnaires were completed by neurosurgical doctors. The majority, 87%, stated the AST round was helpful overall. 93% indicated that informal training on the AST round was a source of education in antibiotic prescribing. Discussion and conclusion: The weekly AST round provided a timely opportunity for multidisciplinary discussion, implementation of antimicrobial stewardship actions and opportunistic antimicrobial stewardship education.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceAntimicrobial stewardshipAntimicrobial stewardship roundMultidisciplinaryNeurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID36248101
PMCPMC9560698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.