ArticleBrain & spine2022
Increased variance in second electrode accuracy during deep brain stimulation and its relationship to pneumocephalus, brain shift, and clinical outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- How I do it: Image-based robot-assisted deep brain stimulation under general anesthesia.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Pneumocephalus after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: The role of brain volume in brain shift.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- NetZero deep brain stimulation: A carbon footprint minimisation audit and environmental impact analysis.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging with photon-counting computed tomography: A review of clinical applications.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Factors affecting targeting accuracy in minimally invasive twist drill deep brain stimulation.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Article
- How I do it - asleep DBS placement for Parkinson's disease.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
•Overall electrode accuracy was 0.22+/-0.4 mm with only 3 (4%) electrodes out with 2 mm from the intended target.•Accuracy was significantly worse in the GPi versus the STN and on the second side implanted.•Inaccuracy occurred in the X (lateral) plane but was not related to pneumocephalus or brain shift.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.