Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36248095›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2022

Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following lumbar decompression surgery: A systematic review.

Edward Goacher, Matthew I Sanders, Marcel Ivanov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Same-day discharge after pediatric neurosurgical procedures: a single-institution experience.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward GoacherDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, United Kingdom.
Matthew I SandersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, United Kingdom.
Marcel IvanovDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar decompression (LD) surgery, with or without discectomy, is a commonly performed surgical procedure. Despite the concept of day-case LD being reported as early as the 1980s, day-case LD is yet to become routine clinical practice. Research question: This systematic review aimed to examine the published literature on the safety and complication rates of day-case LD. Secondary outcome measures, including the economic impact and patient satisfaction of day-case LD, were also examined. Materials and methods: A systematic electronic search was carried out on PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library between 1999 and January 2022. Studies were screened against predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria with the quality of included studies subsequently being assessed. Results: In total, 15 studies were included in this review. The majority of studies were undertaken in the USA (n ​= ​8, 53%) and were of a case series design (n ​= ​9, 60%). Reported complication rates ranged from 0% to 7.8%, with nine studies reporting a complication rate of <4%. Readmission rates ranged from 0% to 7.7%. Seven studies quoted a readmission rate of 0%. Five studies found cost saving benefits of day-case LD in comparison to inpatient LD of up to $27,984 (USD). Patient acceptability of day-case LD was consistently high across the six studies that assessed it. Discussion and conclusion: Day-case LD surgery is a safe and economically efficient surgical option in appropriately selected patients.

Indexed as

ComplicationsDay-caseLumbar decompressionOutpatient

Identifiers

PMID36248095
PMCPMC9559968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.