ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022
Ramucirumab as second-line treatment in Chinese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and elevated alpha-fetoprotein after sorafenib (REACH-2 China): A randomised, multicentre, double-blind study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02435433 (Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study of Ramucirumab and Best Supportive Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study of Ramucirumab and Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo and BSC as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Elevated Baseline Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP) Following First-Line Therapy With Sorafenib
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line therapies for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of second-line therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Evolving Landscape of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Targeted Therapy and Combination Strategies to Emerging Therapies.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review
- Therapeutic Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Advances and Future Perspectives.Vaccines · 2026Review
- China Liver Cancer Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2024 Edition).Liver cancer · 2025Article
- The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma in China: Progress and challenges.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 15 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the global REACH-2 study, ramucirumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). REACH-2 China study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in Chinese patients with advanced HCC (NCT02435433). Methods: REACH-2 China was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study done at 31 centres in China between Sep 16, 2015, and March 15, 2021. Patients with advanced HCC and AFP ≥400 ng/mL after first-line sorafenib were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive ramucirumab 8 mg/kg intravenously or placebo Q2W, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS. Efficacy was assessed per intention-to-treat, and safety in patients who received any treatment. Findings: Of 104 Chinese patients enrolled (44 in the global study and 60 in the China extension study), 70 received ramucirumab and 34 received placebo. Median OS was 9·1 months in the ramucirumab group and 6·2 months in the placebo group (HR = 0·854 [95% CI: 0·536, 1·359]). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event were hypertension (5 [7·1%] of 70 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 1 [2.9%] of 34 in the placebo group), pneumonia (5 [7·1%] vs 1 [2·9%]), and hyponatraemia (4 [5·7%] vs 0 [0%]). Interpretation: Ramucirumab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in OS compared to placebo for Chinese patients with advanced HCC and elevated AFP, although lacking statistical superiority. Ramucirumab was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile. The results are consistent with those of the global REACH-2 study, supporting a favourable risk-benefit profile for ramucirumab in this population. Funding: Eli Lilly and Company, USA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.