ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Diagnostic Value Comparison between Multislice Spiral Computerized Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm in Diagnosing Occult Fractures of the Knee Joint.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Texture analysis combined with machine learning in radiographs of the knee joint: potential to identify tibial plateau occult fractures.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore the application value of multislice spiral computerized tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) under intelligent algorithm in the diagnosis of occult fractures of the knee joint (OFKJ). 47 patients with negative X-ray examination and suspected fracture were included for this research. According to the examination methods, the patients were divided into the MSCT group and MRI group. The diagnostic results of the two methods were compared, and then compared with the traditional algorithm to explore their superiorities. The results demonstrated that the algorithm applied in this study had a clearer segmentation than traditional algorithms, and it run significantly faster than other algorithms. The results of MSCT, MRI, and pathological examination were all different, but which was of no statistical significance,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.