ArticleOphthalmology science2021
Improving Interpretability in Machine Diagnosis: Detection of Geographic Atrophy in OCT Scans.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection and Management of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Noninvasive Retinal Images and Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- SWAU-Net: Longitudinal Prediction of Geographic Atrophy via Sliding-Window Attention.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- When time is of the essence: ethical reconsideration of XAI in time-sensitive environments.Journal of medical ethics · 2025Article
- Recent advances in the application of artificial intelligence in age-related macular degeneration.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Deep-GA-Net for Accurate and Explainable Detection of Geographic Atrophy on OCT Scans.Ophthalmology science · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Applications to Classification and Detection of Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging: A Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Review
- Classification of Color Fundus Photographs Using Fusion Extracted Features and Customized CNN Models.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clinical validation for automated geographic atrophy monitoring on OCT under complement inhibitory treatment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Deep-Reticular Pseudodrusen-Net: A 3-Dimensional Deep Network for Detection of Reticular Pseudodrusen on OCT Scans.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- Deep Learning Approaches for Detecting of Nascent Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Epiretinal Membrane Care: A Scoping Review.Ophthalmology scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Manually identifying geographic atrophy (GA) presence and location on OCT volume scans can be challenging and time consuming. This study developed a deep learning model simultaneously (1) to perform automated detection of GA presence or absence from OCT volume scans and (2) to provide interpretability by demonstrating which regions of which B-scans show GA. Design: Med-XAI-Net, an interpretable deep learning model was developed to detect GA presence or absence from OCT volume scans using only volume scan labels, as well as to interpret the most relevant B-scans and B-scan regions. Participants: One thousand two hundred eighty-four OCT volume scans (each containing 100 B-scans) from 311 participants, including 321 volumes with GA and 963 volumes without GA. Methods: Med-XAI-Net simulates the human diagnostic process by using a region-attention module to locate the most relevant region in each B-scan, followed by an image-attention module to select the most relevant B-scans for classifying GA presence or absence in each OCT volume scan. Med-XAI-Net was trained and tested (80% and 20% participants, respectively) using gold standard volume scan labels from human expert graders. Main Outcome Measures: Accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, F Results: In the detection of GA presence or absence, Med-XAI-Net obtained superior performance (91.5%, 93.5%, 82.3%, 82.8%, and 94.6% on accuracy, area under the ROC curve, F Conclusions: Despite using ground truth labels during training at the volume scan level only, Med-XAI-Net was effective in locating GA in B-scans and selecting relevant B-scans within each volume scan for GA diagnosis. These results illustrate the strengths of Med-XAI-Net in interpreting which regions and B-scans contribute to GA detection in the volume scan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.