Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247813›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2021

Improving Interpretability in Machine Diagnosis: Detection of Geographic Atrophy in OCT Scans.

Xiaoshuang Shi, Tiarnan D L Keenan, Qingyu Chen, Tharindu De Silva, Alisa T Thavikulwat, Geoffrey Broadhead, Sanjeeb Bhandari, Catherine Cukras, Emily Y Chew, Zhiyong Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoshuang ShiNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Tiarnan D L KeenanDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Qingyu ChenNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Tharindu De SilvaDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Alisa T ThavikulwatDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Geoffrey BroadheadDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sanjeeb BhandariDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Catherine CukrasDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Emily Y ChewDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Zhiyong LuNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Manually identifying geographic atrophy (GA) presence and location on OCT volume scans can be challenging and time consuming. This study developed a deep learning model simultaneously (1) to perform automated detection of GA presence or absence from OCT volume scans and (2) to provide interpretability by demonstrating which regions of which B-scans show GA. Design: Med-XAI-Net, an interpretable deep learning model was developed to detect GA presence or absence from OCT volume scans using only volume scan labels, as well as to interpret the most relevant B-scans and B-scan regions. Participants: One thousand two hundred eighty-four OCT volume scans (each containing 100 B-scans) from 311 participants, including 321 volumes with GA and 963 volumes without GA. Methods: Med-XAI-Net simulates the human diagnostic process by using a region-attention module to locate the most relevant region in each B-scan, followed by an image-attention module to select the most relevant B-scans for classifying GA presence or absence in each OCT volume scan. Med-XAI-Net was trained and tested (80% and 20% participants, respectively) using gold standard volume scan labels from human expert graders. Main Outcome Measures: Accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, F Results: In the detection of GA presence or absence, Med-XAI-Net obtained superior performance (91.5%, 93.5%, 82.3%, 82.8%, and 94.6% on accuracy, area under the ROC curve, F Conclusions: Despite using ground truth labels during training at the volume scan level only, Med-XAI-Net was effective in locating GA in B-scans and selecting relevant B-scans within each volume scan for GA diagnosis. These results illustrate the strengths of Med-XAI-Net in interpreting which regions and B-scans contribute to GA detection in the volume scan.

Indexed as

AMD, age-related macular degenerationAREDS2, Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2AUC, area under curveCAM, class activation mappingCFP, color fundus photographCNN, convolutional neural networkcRORA, complete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophyDeep learningGA detectionGA, geographic atrophyGrad-CAM, gradient-weighted class activation mappingI3D, Inflated 3D ConvnetInterpretableOCTPR-AUC, area under PR curvePR, precision-recallROC, receiver operating characteristicRPE, retinal pigment epitheliumSD, spectral-domainXAI, explainable artificial intelligence

Identifiers

PMID36247813
PMCPMC9559084
OpenAlexW3178124254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.