ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Exploratory evaluation of an eye-tracking system in patients with advanced spinal muscular atrophy type I receiving nusinersen.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of Eye Movements in Adults with Spinal Muscular Atrophy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Cognition and communication in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: A systematic review.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the feasibility of a matching-pair test using eye-tracking technology to assess nusinersen effectiveness in patients with advanced spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type I. Methods: This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with 5q-SMA type I who had lost gross motor function. Three different levels of matching-pair tests were conducted using the eye-gaze system (My Tobii; TobiiDynavox Inc.) at baseline, and after 9 and 24 weeks of nusinersen treatment. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in matching-pair test scores and response times (i.e., the time to answer matching-pair test) at 24 weeks from baseline. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND), Pediatric Quality of Life inventory for patients with Neuromuscular Disease (PedsQL-NM) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores were also assessed as secondary endpoints. Analysis of ocular fixation was performed as an additional analysis. This study was registered at https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ (UMIN000033935). Results: Seven patients (one male, six female) aged 5-21 years (median 11 years) were enrolled; all patients were bedridden and six patients were ventilated. All seven patients were able to conduct level 1 matching-pair tests at each assessment; five patients were also able to conduct levels 2 and 3. Two patients (those with the highest CHOP-INTEND scores) were able to complete all tests correctly within 60 s. There was a non-significant trend toward improvement in CHOP-INTEND, PedsQL-NM, and NRS scores over the 6-month period. There were no significant differences in the number of actions, errors, correct answers, or response times between baseline and Week 9 or 24 at any level. However, the result of an additional analysis suggests that detection of eye movement would be useful to evaluate for advanced SMA. Conclusions: Eye-tracking systems are possibly feasible for the assessment of treatment efficacy in patients with advanced SMA type I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.