ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
A precise language network revealed by the independent component-based lesion mapping in post-stroke aphasia.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic functional reorganization in post-stroke aphasia: a state-of-the-art fMRI review from disease evolution to intervention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain lesion mapping studies have provided the strongest evidence regarding the neural basis of cognition. However, it remained a problem to identify symptom-specific brain networks accounting for observed clinical and neuroanatomical heterogeneity. Independent component analysis (ICA) is a statistical method that decomposes mixed signals into multiple independent components. We aimed to solve this issue by proposing an independent component-based lesion mapping (ICLM) method to identify the language network in patients with moderate to severe post-stroke aphasia. Lesions were first extracted from 49 patients with post-stroke aphasia as masks applied to fMRI data in a cohort of healthy participants to calculate the functional connectivity (FC) within the masks and non-mask brain voxels. ICA was further performed on a reformatted FC matrix to extract multiple independent networks. Specifically, we found that one of the lesion-related independent components (ICs) highly resembled classical language networks. Moreover, the damaged level within the language-related lesioned network is strongly associated with language deficits, including aphasia quotient, naming, and auditory comprehension scores. In comparison, none of the other two traditional lesion mapping methods found any regions responsible for language dysfunction. The language-related lesioned network extracted with the ICLM method showed high specificity in detecting aphasia symptoms compared with the performance of resting ICs and classical language networks. In total, we detected a precise language network in patients with aphasia and proved its efficiency in the relationship with language symptoms. In general, our ICLM could successfully identify multiple lesion-related networks from complicated brain diseases, and be used as an effective tool to study brain-behavior relationships and provide potential biomarkers of particular clinical behavioral deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.