Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247731›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2022

Hearing, touching, and multisensory integration during mate choice.

Constanze Lenschow, Ana Rita P Mendes, Susana Q Lima

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Developmental encoding of natural sounds in the mouse auditory cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Neurophysiology of male sexual arousal-Behavioral perspective.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Constanze LenschowChampalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Research, Neuroscience Program, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Rita P MendesChampalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Research, Neuroscience Program, Lisbon, Portugal.
Susana Q LimaChampalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Research, Neuroscience Program, Lisbon, Portugal.
Champalimaud Foundation · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mate choice is a potent generator of diversity and a fundamental pillar for sexual selection and evolution. Mate choice is a multistage affair, where complex sensory information and elaborate actions are used to identify, scrutinize, and evaluate potential mating partners. While widely accepted that communication during mate assessment relies on multimodal cues, most studies investigating the mechanisms controlling this fundamental behavior have restricted their focus to the dominant sensory modality used by the species under examination, such as vision in humans and smell in rodents. However, despite their undeniable importance for the initial recognition, attraction, and approach towards a potential mate, other modalities gain relevance as the interaction progresses, amongst which are touch and audition. In this review, we will: (1) focus on recent findings of how touch and audition can contribute to the evaluation and choice of mating partners, and (2) outline our current knowledge regarding the neuronal circuits processing touch and audition (amongst others) in the context of mate choice and ask (3) how these neural circuits are connected to areas that have been studied in the light of multisensory integration.

Indexed as

TouchTouch PerceptionAuditory PerceptionHearingHumansSmellauditionmate choicemultisensory integrationneural circuitsomatosensation

Identifiers

PMID36247731
PMCPMC9559228
OpenAlexW4297012633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.