Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247550›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Wheat lodging extraction using Improved_Unet network.

Jun Yu, Tao Cheng, Ning Cai, Fenfang Lin, Xin-Gen Zhou, Shizhou Du, Dongyan Zhang, Gan Zhang, Dong Liang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun YuNational Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Tao ChengNational Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Ning CaiNational Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Fenfang LinNational Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Xin-Gen ZhouNational Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Shizhou DuNational Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Dongyan ZhangNational Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Gan ZhangNational Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Dong LiangNational Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Anhui University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate extraction of wheat lodging areas can provide important technical support for post-disaster yield loss assessment and lodging-resistant wheat breeding. At present, wheat lodging assessment is facing the contradiction between timeliness and accuracy, and there is also a lack of effective lodging extraction methods. This study aims to propose a wheat lodging assessment method applicable to multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) flight heights. The quadrotor UAV was used to collect high-definition images of wheat canopy at the grain filling and maturity stages, and the Unet network was evaluated and improved by introducing the Involution operator and Dense block module. The performance of the Improved_Unet was determined using the data collected from different flight heights, and the robustness of the improved network was verified with data from different years in two different geographical locations. The results of analyses show that (1) the Improved_Unet network was better than other networks (Segnet, Unet and DeeplabV3+ networks) evaluated in terms of segmentation accuracy, with the average improvement of each indicator being 3% and the maximum average improvement being 6%. The Improved_Unet network was more effective in extracting wheat lodging areas at the maturity stage. The four evaluation indicators, Precision, Dice, Recall, and Accuracy, were all the highest, which were 0.907, 0.929, 0.884, and 0.933, respectively; (2) the Improved_Unet network had the strongest robustness, and its Precision, Dice, Recall, and Accuracy reached 0.851, 0.892, 0.844, and 0.885, respectively, at the verification stage of using lodging data from other wheat production areas; and (3) the flight height had an influence on the lodging segmentation accuracy. The results of verification show that the 20-m flight height performed the best among the flight heights of 20, 40, 80 and 120 m evaluated, and the segmentation accuracy decreased with the increase of the flight height. The Precision, Dice, Recall, and Accuracy of the Improved_Unet changed from 0.907 to 0.845, from 0.929 to 0.864, from 0.884 to 0.841, and from 0.933 to 0.881, respectively. The results demonstrate the improved ability of the Improved-Unet to extract wheat lodging features. The proposed deep learning network can effectively extract the areas of wheat lodging, and the different height fusion models developed from this study can provide a more comprehensive reference for the automatic extraction of wheat lodging.

Indexed as

deep learningImproved_Unetlodging extractionUAV imageswheat

Identifiers

PMID36247550
PMCPMC9563998
OpenAlexW4298137862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.