Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247549›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Will epigenetics be a key player in crop breeding?

Kaoru Tonosaki, Ryo Fujimoto, Elizabeth S Dennis, Victor Raboy, Kenji Osabe

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Epigenomics and Non-Coding RNAs in Soybean Adaptation to Abiotic Stresses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Advances in Soybean Genetic Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tools and Techniques to Accelerate Crop Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Heritable responses to stress in plants.Quantitative plant biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kaoru TonosakiKihara Institute for Biological Research, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Ryo FujimotoGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Elizabeth S DennisCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Victor RaboyIndependent Researcher Portland, Portland, OR, United States.
Kenji OsabeInstitute of Scientific and Industrial Research (SANKEN), Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUKobe University · JPOsaka Research Institute of Industrial Science and Technology · JPUniversity of Portland · USYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If food and feed production are to keep up with world demand in the face of climate change, continued progress in understanding and utilizing both genetic and epigenetic sources of crop variation is necessary. Progress in plant breeding has traditionally been thought to be due to selection for spontaneous DNA sequence mutations that impart desirable phenotypes. These spontaneous mutations can expand phenotypic diversity, from which breeders can select agronomically useful traits. However, it has become clear that phenotypic diversity can be generated even when the genome sequence is unaltered. Epigenetic gene regulation is a mechanism by which genome expression is regulated without altering the DNA sequence. With the development of high throughput DNA sequencers, it has become possible to analyze the epigenetic state of the whole genome, which is termed the epigenome. These techniques enable us to identify spontaneous epigenetic mutations (epimutations) with high throughput and identify the epimutations that lead to increased phenotypic diversity. These epimutations can create new phenotypes and the causative epimutations can be inherited over generations. There is evidence of selected agronomic traits being conditioned by heritable epimutations, and breeders may have historically selected for epiallele-conditioned agronomic traits. These results imply that not only DNA sequence diversity, but the diversity of epigenetic states can contribute to increased phenotypic diversity. However, since the modes of induction and transmission of epialleles and their stability differ from that of genetic alleles, the importance of inheritance as classically defined also differs. For example, there may be a difference between the types of epigenetic inheritance important to crop breeding and crop production. The former may depend more on longer-term inheritance whereas the latter may simply take advantage of shorter-term phenomena. With the advances in our understanding of epigenetics, epigenetics may bring new perspectives for crop improvement, such as the use of epigenetic variation or epigenome editing in breeding. In this review, we will introduce the role of epigenetic variation in plant breeding, largely focusing on DNA methylation, and conclude by asking to what extent new knowledge of epigenetics in crop breeding has led to documented cases of its successful use.

Indexed as

breedingDNA methylationepialleleepigeneticsepigenome editingintergenerational inheritanceparamutationtransgenerational inheritance

Identifiers

PMID36247549
PMCPMC9562705
OpenAlexW4298142534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.