Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247437›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Prognostic impact of incident left ventricular systolic dysfunction after myocardial infarction.

Goro Yoshioka, Atsushi Tanaka, Nozomi Watanabe, Kensaku Nishihira, Masahiro Natsuaki, Atsushi Kawaguchi, Yoshisato Shibata, Koichi Node

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Goro YoshiokaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Atsushi TanakaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Nozomi WatanabeDepartment of Cardiovascular Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Kensaku NishihiraMiyazaki Medical Association Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Miyazaki, Japan.
Masahiro NatsuakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Atsushi KawaguchiCenter for Comprehensive Community Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Yoshisato ShibataMiyazaki Medical Association Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Miyazaki, Japan.
Koichi NodeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Saga University · JPUniversity of Miyazaki Hospital · JPUniversity of Miyazaki · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We sought to investigate the prognostic impact of incident left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction at the chronic phase of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Materials and methods: Among 2,266 consecutive patients admitted for AMI, 1,330 patients with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 40% during hospitalization who had LVEF data at 6 months after AMI were analyzed. Patients were divided into three subgroups based on LVEF at 6 months: reduced-LVEF (<40%), mid-range-LVEF (≥ 40% and < 50%) and preserved-LVEF (≥ 50%). Occurrence of a composite of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death after 6 months of AMI was the primary endpoint. The prognostic impact of LVEF at 6 months was assessed with a multivariate-adjusted Cox model. Results: Overall, the mean patient age was 67.5 ± 11.9 years, and LVEF during initial hospitalization was 59.4 ± 9.1%. The median (interquartile range) duration of follow-up was 3.0 (1.5-4.8) years, and the primary endpoint occurred in 35/1330 (2.6%) patients (13/69 [18.8%] in the reduced-LVEF, 9/265 [3.4%] in the mid-range-LVEF, and 13/996 [1.3%] in the preserved-LVEF category). The adjusted hazard ratio for the primary endpoint in the reduced-LVEF vs. mid-range-LVEF category and in the reduced-LVEF vs. preserved-LVEF category was 4.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83 to 12.13; p < 0.001) and 14.37 (95% CI, 5.38 to 38.36; p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Incident LV systolic dysfunction at the chronic phase after AMI was significantly associated with long-term adverse outcomes. Even in AMI survivors without LV systolic dysfunction at the time of AMI, post-AMI reassessment and careful monitoring of LVEF are required to identify patients at risk.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionleft ventricular ejection fractionleft ventricular systolic dysfunctionprognosisreassessment

Identifiers

PMID36247437
PMCPMC9557083
OpenAlexW4298002532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.