ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Prognostic impact of incident left ventricular systolic dysfunction after myocardial infarction.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of the Extracellular Volume of the Infarction Zone and the Remote Myocardium in Predicting Systolic Dysfunction After the First Myocardial Infarction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predictive value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain for mid-term major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation complicated by acute myocardial infarction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Poor Mental Health Status as a Risk Factor and Prognosticator in SMuRF-Less Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Left Ventricular Global Function Index: A Potential Predictor of Mortality and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in NSTEMI Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Elevated carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) is associated with incident heart failure and mortality in acute coronary syndrome.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Importance of reassessment to identify trajectories of chronic transition of clinical indicators in post-myocardial infarction management.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2024Review
- Association Between Admission Systolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Events in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with Different Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Association of peak C-reactive protein with long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Heart and vessels · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We sought to investigate the prognostic impact of incident left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction at the chronic phase of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Materials and methods: Among 2,266 consecutive patients admitted for AMI, 1,330 patients with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 40% during hospitalization who had LVEF data at 6 months after AMI were analyzed. Patients were divided into three subgroups based on LVEF at 6 months: reduced-LVEF (<40%), mid-range-LVEF (≥ 40% and < 50%) and preserved-LVEF (≥ 50%). Occurrence of a composite of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death after 6 months of AMI was the primary endpoint. The prognostic impact of LVEF at 6 months was assessed with a multivariate-adjusted Cox model. Results: Overall, the mean patient age was 67.5 ± 11.9 years, and LVEF during initial hospitalization was 59.4 ± 9.1%. The median (interquartile range) duration of follow-up was 3.0 (1.5-4.8) years, and the primary endpoint occurred in 35/1330 (2.6%) patients (13/69 [18.8%] in the reduced-LVEF, 9/265 [3.4%] in the mid-range-LVEF, and 13/996 [1.3%] in the preserved-LVEF category). The adjusted hazard ratio for the primary endpoint in the reduced-LVEF vs. mid-range-LVEF category and in the reduced-LVEF vs. preserved-LVEF category was 4.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83 to 12.13; p < 0.001) and 14.37 (95% CI, 5.38 to 38.36; p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Incident LV systolic dysfunction at the chronic phase after AMI was significantly associated with long-term adverse outcomes. Even in AMI survivors without LV systolic dysfunction at the time of AMI, post-AMI reassessment and careful monitoring of LVEF are required to identify patients at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.