ArticleMuscles, ligaments and tendons journal
Differences at the Achilles Insertion Between Adults with Insertional and Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy as Observed Using Ultrasound.
Article in Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of eccentric exercise in the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of reducing tendon compression in the rehabilitation of insertional Achilles tendinopathy: a randomised clinical trial.British journal of sports medicine · 2025Trial
- Influence of retrocalcaneal bursal effusion on the mechanical behavior of the Achilles tendon insertion during ankle dorsiflexion: a cadaveric study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
- Assessment of calf muscle constitution in chronic Achilles tendon disease using Dixon-based MRI.Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine structural and pathological differences of Achilles tendon insertion between insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) and midportion Achilles tendinopathy (MidAT) in both injured and uninjured sides.
methodsPatients (n=34; 58.8% male) with unilateral Achilles tendinopathy (50% with IAT; 50% with MidAT) were recruited. Median age 52 years and Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) score mean 59, and 17 (12 male) had MidAT, median(range) age of 58(48)years, and VISA-A score mean(SD) 59.1(19.7). Ultrasound imaging was used to evaluate structural measurements at the insertion (insertional length, bone-to-insertion length, and tendon insertion angle), tendon length (calcaneus to soleus), tendon thickness at the calcaneal edge, and the presence of pathological changes (boney deformity and/or calcification). A 2×2 mixed Analysis of Variance (group by side) was used to compare IAT and MidAT groups and injured and uninjured sides.
resultsTendon thickness at the calcaneus on the injured side was significantly greater than the uninjured side in the IAT group but not in the MidAT group (P=.001). VISA-A score was 59.9(18.7) in IAT group and 59.1(19.7) for MidAT group (P=.909). There were no significant group-by-side interactions for structural measurements at insertion site.
conclusionCalcaneal edge tendon thickness was the only significant structural difference observed between involved and uninvolved sides in IAT, although this was not found in in MidAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.