Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247363›Full record

ReviewJournal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences2022

The Spectral Species Concept in Living Color.

Duccio Rocchini, Maria J Santos, Susan L Ustin, Jean-Baptiste Féret, Gregory P Asner, Carl Beierkuhnlein, Michele Dalponte, Hannes Feilhauer, Giles M Foody, Gary N Geller and 20 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Monitoring vegetation- and geodiversity with remote sensing and traits.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Spectral Species Concept in Living Color.Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

Duccio RocchiniBIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna Bologna Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0087-0594
Maria J SantosDepartment of Geography University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Susan L UstinDepartment of Land, Air, and Water Resources University of California Davis Davis CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-0461
Jean-Baptiste FéretUMR-TETIS IRSTEA Montpellier, Maison de la Télédétection Montpellier Cedex 5 France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0151-1334
Gregory P AsnerCenter for Global Discovery and Conservation Science Arizona State University Tempe AZ USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7893-6421
Carl BeierkuhnleinBiogeography, BayCEER University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany.
Michele DalponteSustainable Ecosystems and Bioresources Department, Research and Innovation Centre Fondazione Edmund Mach San Michele all'Adige Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9850-8985
Hannes FeilhauerRemote Sensing Center for Earth System Research University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Giles M FoodySchool of Geography University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6464-3054
Gary N GellerNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA.
Thomas W GillespieDepartment of Geography University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-0691
Kate S HeDepartment of Biological Sciences Murray State University Murray KY USA.
David KleijnPlant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands.
Pedro J LeitãoDepartment Landscape Ecology and Environmental System Analysis Technische Universität Braunschweig Braunschweig Germany.
Marco MalavasiDepartment of Spatial Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Faculty of Environmental Sciences Praha Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9639-1784
Vítězslav MoudrýDepartment of Spatial Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Faculty of Environmental Sciences Praha Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3194-451X
Jana MüllerováDepartment of GIS and Remote Sensing Institute of Botany The Czech Acad. Sciences Průhonice Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7331-3479
Harini NagendraAzim Premji University PES Institute of Technology Campus Bangalore India.
Signe NormandDepartment of Biology, Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity Aarhus University Aarhus C Denmark.
Carlo RicottaDepartment of Environmental Biology University of Rome "La Sapienza" Rome Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0818-3959
Michael E SchaepmanDepartment of Geography, Remote Sensing Laboratories University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9627-9565
Sebastian SchmidtleinInstitute of Geography and Geoecology Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Karlsruhe Germany.
Andrew K SkidmoreFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) University of Twente Enschede The Netherlands.
Petra ŠímováDepartment of Spatial Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Faculty of Environmental Sciences Praha Czech Republic.
Michele TorresaniBIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
Philip A TownsendDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin Madison WI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-8774
Woody TurnerEarth Science Division NASA Headquarters Washington DC USA.
Petteri VihervaaraNatural Environment Centre Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) Helsinki Finland.
Martin WegmannDepartment of Remote Sensing University of Wuerzburg Wuerzburg Germany.
Jonathan LenoirUMR CNRS 7058 "Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés" (EDYSAN) Université de Picardie Jules Verne Amiens France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-9582
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZUniversity of Zurich · CHAarhus University · DKArizona State University · USAzim Premji University · INCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany · CZFinnish Environment Institute · FIFondazione Edmund Mach · ITHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEJet Propulsion Laboratory · USKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DELeipzig University · DEMurray State University · USNational Association of Social Workers · USSapienza University of Rome · ITTerritoires · FRUniversity of Bayreuth · DEUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity monitoring is an almost inconceivable challenge at the scale of the entire Earth. The current (and soon to be flown) generation of spaceborne and airborne optical sensors (i.e., imaging spectrometers) can collect detailed information at unprecedented spatial, temporal, and spectral resolutions. These new data streams are preceded by a revolution in modeling and analytics that can utilize the richness of these datasets to measure a wide range of plant traits, community composition, and ecosystem functions. At the heart of this framework for monitoring plant biodiversity is the idea of remotely identifying species by making use of the 'spectral species' concept. In theory, the spectral species concept can be defined as a species characterized by a unique spectral signature and thus remotely detectable within pixel units of a spectral image. In reality, depending on spatial resolution, pixels may contain several species which renders species-specific assignment of spectral information more challenging. The aim of this paper is to review the spectral species concept and relate it to underlying ecological principles, while also discussing the complexities, challenges and opportunities to apply this concept given current and future scientific advances in remote sensing.

Indexed as

airborne sensorsbiodiversityecoinformaticshyperspectral imagesplant optical typesremote sensingsatellite imageryvegetation communities

Identifiers

PMID36247363
PMCPMC9539608
OpenAlexW4291274996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.