Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247348›Full record

ArticleFish and fisheries (Oxford, England)2022

Untangling social-ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries.

Emilie Lindkvist, Kara E Pellowe, Steven M Alexander, Elizabeth Drury O'Neill, Elena M Finkbeiner, Alfredo Girón-Nava, Blanca González-Mon, Andrew F Johnson, Jeremy Pittman, Caroline Schill and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Emilie LindkvistStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1546-0934
Kara E PelloweStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Steven M AlexanderFaculty of Environment University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9285-879X
Elizabeth Drury O'NeillStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3557-6571
Elena M FinkbeinerCenter for Oceans, Conservation International Honolulu Hawaii USA.
Alfredo Girón-NavaStanford Center for Ocean Solutions Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.
Blanca González-MonStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Andrew F JohnsonMarFishEco Fisheries Consultants Edinburgh UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3365-8768
Jeremy PittmanSchool of Planning University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8327-184X
Caroline SchillBeijer Institute of Ecological Economics Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Stockholm Sweden.
Nanda WijermansStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-315X
Örjan BodinStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Stefan GelcichCenter for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES) Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5976-9311
Marion GlaserLeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT) Bremen Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions between people and ecosystems. Despite advances in the scope and scale of interactions encompassed by more holistic methods, for example ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches, no single method can adequately capture the complexity of human-nature interactions. Approaches that combine quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches are necessary to generate a deeper understanding of these interactions and illuminate pathways to address fisheries sustainability challenges. However, combining methods is inherently challenging and requires understanding multiple methods from different, often disciplinarily distinct origins, demanding reflexivity of the researchers involved. Social-ecological systems' research has a history of utilising combinations of methods across the social and ecological realms to account for spatial and temporal dynamics, uncertainty and feedbacks that are key components of fisheries. We describe several categories of analytical methods (statistical modelling, network analysis, dynamic modelling, qualitative analysis and controlled behavioural experiments) and highlight their applications in fisheries research, strengths and limitations, data needs and overall objectives. We then discuss important considerations of a methods portfolio development process, including reflexivity, epistemological and ontological concerns and illustrate these considerations via three case studies. We show that, by expanding their methods portfolios, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex interactions shaping fisheries and contribute to solutions for sustainable fisheries management.

Indexed as

analytical methodsfisheries managementinterdisciplinaritymulti‐method approachesreflexivitysocial–ecological systems

Identifiers

PMID36247348
PMCPMC9546375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.