Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247314›Full record

ReviewDEN open2023

Early versus delayed interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yousuke Nakai, Hideyuki Shiomi, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Shogo Ota, Mamoru Takenaka, Takuji Iwashita, Tatsuya Sato, Tomotaka Saito, Atsuhiro Masuda, Saburo Matsubara and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DEN open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Acute pancreatitis: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of severe acute pancreatitis. Evidence based medicine (EBM) clinical practice guidelines.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Percutaneous Biopsy and Drainage of the Pancreas.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Yousuke NakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-1385
Hideyuki ShiomiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases Department of Internal Medicine Hyogo Medical University Hyogo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7461-8538
Tsuyoshi HamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Shogo OtaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases Department of Internal Medicine Hyogo Medical University Hyogo Japan.
Mamoru TakenakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kindai University Faculty of Medicine Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7308-4311
Takuji IwashitaFirst Department of Internal Medicine Gifu University Hospital Gifu Japan.
Tatsuya SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5142-4706
Tomotaka SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Atsuhiro MasudaDivision of Gastroenterology Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Hyogo Japan.
Saburo MatsubaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Medical Center Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8182-3524
Keisuke IwataDepartment of Gastroenterology Gifu Municipal Hospital Gifu Japan.
Tsuyoshi MukaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Endoscopy Kanazawa Medical University Ishikawa Japan.
Hiroyuki IsayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine Juntendo University Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6206-9236
Ichiro YasudaThird Department of Internal Medicine University of Toyama Toyama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6888-0310
WONDERFUL study group in Japan
Hyogo Medical University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPGifu Municipal Hospital · JPGifu University Hospital · JPJuntendo University · JPKanazawa Medical University · JPKindai University · JPKobe University · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JPUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis are generally postponed until 4 weeks after the onset of acute pancreatitis, but there remains controversy about whether we should always wait >4 weeks or can intervene early when necessary. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate treatment outcomes of necrotizing pancreatitis according to the cut-off defined in the revised Atlanta classification (≤4 vs. >4 weeks). Methods: Using PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database, we identified clinical studies published until March 2022 with data comparing outcomes of early and delayed interventions of necrotizing pancreatitis. We pooled data on adverse events, mortality, technical and clinical success rates, and needs for necrosectomy and open surgery, using the random-effects model. Results: We identified 11 retrospective studies, including 775 patients with early interventions and 725 patients with delayed interventions. Patients with early interventions tended to be complicated by organ failure. The rate of adverse events was comparable (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.66-3.01; Conclusions: Early interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis were associated with higher mortality rates and did not reduce adverse events or improve clinical success. However, our results should be confirmed in prospective studies.

Indexed as

acute necrotizing pancreatitisdrainageendoscopic ultrasoundnecrosectomywalled‐off necrosis

Identifiers

PMID36247314
PMCPMC9549879
OpenAlexW4304014608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.