Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247209›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2022

The utility of home tonometry for peri-interventional decision-making in glaucoma surgery: Case series.

Ariana M Levin, Elyse J McGlumphy, Craig J Chaya, Barbara M Wirostko, Thomas V Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Is It Here to Stay?Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Home iCare - What we already know.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ariana M LevinMoran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Elyse J McGlumphyGlaucoma Center of Excellence, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Craig J ChayaMoran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Barbara M WirostkoMoran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Thomas V JohnsonGlaucoma Center of Excellence, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Utah · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To describe twelve cases in which home intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring complimented clinical decision-making in glaucoma management. Observations: Home IOP monitoring elucidated peaks and amplitudes of variation that were not captured by in-clinic IOP measurements during the pre- or post-interventional period. Conclusions & Importance: Home monitoring can establish pre-treatment IOP patterns that are not evident during in-clinic measurements. Home monitoring can also demonstrate response to treatment more quickly than in-clinic monitoring, and provide more information about nyctohemoral fluctuations than is ascertained by in-clinic tonometry.

Indexed as

Diurnal intraocular pressureGlaucoma surgeryHome monitoringIntraocular pressure fluctuationTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36247209
PMCPMC9562449
OpenAlexW4295016321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.