Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247124›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Study on chronic toxicity of rhubarb extract in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Wenxiang Yang, Ji Liu, Yanhua Zheng, Jingjing Qu, Xiaoqiao Tang, Hong Bai, Chunxia Liu, Bolin Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wenxiang YangHubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China.
Ji LiuCenter for Food Evaluation, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 10070, China.
Yanhua ZhengHubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China.
Jingjing QuHubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China.
Xiaoqiao TangHubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China.
Hong BaiCenter for Food Evaluation, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 10070, China.
Chunxia LiuHubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China.
Bolin FanHubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of rhubarb extract. Methods: SD rats were treated with rhubarb extract at 0, 101, 405 and 1620 mg/kg/day for 52 weeks. food consumption and body weights were recorded. Blood and urine samples were collected for serum biochemical evaluation and urinalysis, and organ tissues were collected for histopathological examination. Results: The rats of 1620 mg/kg group developed diarrhea symptoms with dark brown loose stool after exposure; decreased body weight and increased food consumption were observed in the 1620 mg/kg and 405 mg/kg groups; urine WBC and NIT was significantly increased in the male and female rats of 1620 mg/kg group, and the urine pH was decreased in male rats of 1620 mg/kg group; renal tubular pigmentation was observed in the 1620 mg/kg group. Conclusion: The NOAEL of rhubarb extract on chronic toxicity (52 weeks) of Sprague-Dawley rats was 101 mg/kg in female and 94 mg/kg in male, and the LOAEL was 408 mg/kg in female and 381 mg/kg in male. The target organ of toxicity was the kidney, and the target cells was tubular epithelial cells.

Indexed as

Chronic toxicityRhubarb extractSprague-Dawley rats

Identifiers

PMID36247124
PMCPMC9557872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.