ArticleHeliyon2022
A wireless sensor network node fault diagnosis model based on belief rule base with power set.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Correlation-Decoupled Interval Belief Rule Base for Interpretable Cross-Condition Bearing Fault Diagnosis.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A novel hybrid extreme learning machine-based diagnosis model for sensor node faults in aquaculture.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wireless sensor network (WSN) is inevitably subject to node failures due to their harsh operating environments and extra-long working hours. In order to ensure reliable and correct data collection, WSN node fault diagnosis is necessary. Fault diagnosis of sensor nodes usually requires the extraction of data features from the original collected data. However, the data features of different types of faults sometimes have similarities, making it difficult to distinguish and represent the types of faults in the diagnosis results, these indistinguishable types of faults are called ambiguous information. Therefore, a belief rule base with power set (PBRB) fault diagnosis method is proposed. In this method, the power set identification framework is used to represent the fuzzy information, the evidential reasoning (ER) method is used as the reasoning process, and the projection covariance matrix adaptive evolution strategy (P-CMA-ES) is used as the parameter optimization algorithm. The results of the case study show that PBRB method has higher accuracy and better stability compared to other commonly used fault diagnosis methods. According to the research results, PBRB can not only represent the fault types that are difficult to distinguish, but also has the advantage of small sample training. This makes the model obtain high fault diagnosis accuracy and stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.