Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247121›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

A wireless sensor network node fault diagnosis model based on belief rule base with power set.

Guo-Wen Sun, Wei He, Hai-Long Zhu, Zi-Jiang Yang, Quan-Qi Mu, Yu-He Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guo-Wen SunHarbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China.
Wei HeHarbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China.
Hai-Long ZhuHarbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China.
Zi-Jiang YangHeilongjiang Agricultural Engineering Vocational College, Harbin, 157041, China.
Quan-Qi MuHarbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China.
Yu-He WangHarbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China.
Harbin Normal University · CNHeilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wireless sensor network (WSN) is inevitably subject to node failures due to their harsh operating environments and extra-long working hours. In order to ensure reliable and correct data collection, WSN node fault diagnosis is necessary. Fault diagnosis of sensor nodes usually requires the extraction of data features from the original collected data. However, the data features of different types of faults sometimes have similarities, making it difficult to distinguish and represent the types of faults in the diagnosis results, these indistinguishable types of faults are called ambiguous information. Therefore, a belief rule base with power set (PBRB) fault diagnosis method is proposed. In this method, the power set identification framework is used to represent the fuzzy information, the evidential reasoning (ER) method is used as the reasoning process, and the projection covariance matrix adaptive evolution strategy (P-CMA-ES) is used as the parameter optimization algorithm. The results of the case study show that PBRB method has higher accuracy and better stability compared to other commonly used fault diagnosis methods. According to the research results, PBRB can not only represent the fault types that are difficult to distinguish, but also has the advantage of small sample training. This makes the model obtain high fault diagnosis accuracy and stability.

Indexed as

Belief rule baseFault diagnosisPower setWireless sensor network

Identifiers

PMID36247121
PMCPMC9557909
OpenAlexW4303182758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.