Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36247097›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of learning disabilities2022

'Internet is easy if you know how to use it': Doing online research with people with learning disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Magdalena Mikulak, Sara Ryan, Siabhainn Russell, Sue Caton, Richard Keagan-Bull, Rebecca Spalding, Francesca Ribenfors, Christopher Hatton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of learning disabilities, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Thinking Together; A Social Care Learning Community, '10 Minutes of Britney' and Flourishing Lives.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena MikulakDepartment of Social Care and Social Work Manchester Metropolitan University, Brooks Building Manchester UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1519-7673
Sara RyanDepartment of Social Care and Social Work Manchester Metropolitan University, Brooks Building Manchester UK.
Siabhainn RussellDepartment of Social Care and Social Work Manchester Metropolitan University, Brooks Building Manchester UK.
Sue CatonDepartment of Social Care and Social Work Manchester Metropolitan University, Brooks Building Manchester UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9013-8721
Richard Keagan-BullLearning Disability England Birmingham UK.
Rebecca SpaldingDepartment of Social Care and Social Work Manchester Metropolitan University, Brooks Building Manchester UK.
Francesca RibenforsDepartment of Social Care and Social Work Manchester Metropolitan University, Brooks Building Manchester UK.
Christopher HattonDepartment of Social Care and Social Work Manchester Metropolitan University, Brooks Building Manchester UK.
Manchester Metropolitan University · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic changed the way we live, work, interact and do research. Many activities moved online, and digital inclusion became an urgent issue for researchers working with people with learning disabilities and other groups at risk of exclusion. This has generated new questions about how we conduct research and what it means to go into 'the field'. Methods: We discuss our experience working across four qualitative research projects involving 867 participants with learning disabilities, conducted during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Findings: Moving research online resulted in often-swift adaptations to research designs and practice, bringing new insights and benefits to our studies. The changing circumstances fostered innovation and greater flexibility and contributed to research becoming more accessible to many. However, doing research online also posed new challenges as well as amplified existing ones. Conclusions: The pandemic has made it easier for some people with learning disabilities to participate in research, but more needs to be done to improve the reach and quality of that participation. Researchers should make the process of participation as accessible as possible. It is also their job to question and challenge the conditions that create barriers to participation in research and to look for ways to change these. We make some recommendations on how this can be achieved.

Indexed as

empowerment issueslearning (intellectual) disabilitiesresearch

Identifiers

PMID36247097
PMCPMC9538067
OpenAlexW4289222958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.