ArticleBioMed research international2022
Clinical Analysis of 85 Cases of External Auditory Canal Cholesteatoma Surgery under Specialized Endoscopy.
Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hidden Peril in the Ear: A Case of External Auditory Canal Cholesteatoma in a Teenager.Annals of African medicine · 2026Article
- Imaging of Pathologies of the Temporal Bone and Middle Ear: Inflammatory Diseases, Their Mimics and Potential Complications-Pictorial Review.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- Retracted: Clinical Analysis of 85 Cases of External Auditory Canal Cholesteatoma Surgery under Specialized Endoscopy.BioMed research international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-21Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics, surgical experience, and surgical outcomes of external auditory canal cholesteatoma (EACC) surgery under endoscopic otolaryngoscopy. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 85 EACC cases admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, from January 2016 to February 2021 was performed, followed by retrospective analysis of clinical data to explore the feasibility and clinical characteristics of all-oral endoscopic EACC surgery. A total of 85 EACC patients (90 ears) with a mean age of 49.93 ± 14.87 years were included in the study. According to Udayabhanu staging, 43 ears (47.78%) were stage I, 40 ears (44.44%) were stage II, and 7 ears (7.78%) were stage III. All patients underwent transendoscopic surgery. Results: 79 ears (87.78%) underwent endoscopic EACC resection alone (+external auditory canal tumor resection/tympanostomy tube insertion), 9 ears (10%) underwent endoscopic EACC resection+tympanostomy+tympanoplasty, 1 ear (1.11%) underwent endoscopic EACC resection+tympanoplasty, and 2 ears (2.22%) underwent EACC resection+otolaryngotomy+tympanoplasty+auditory chain reconstruction endoscopically. Of these, 7 ears (7.78%) underwent auricular cartilage-chondroplasty and 2 ears (2.22%) underwent auricular cartilage membrane repair. All patients were reviewed at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. One patient with stage II external auditory atresia had a recurrence after 6 months and underwent endoscopic ear surgery (ESS) again. One patient with stage 2 atresia recurred after 1 year and again underwent endoscopic ear surgery. The rest of the patients recovered well after the surgery, and the grafts healed well. Conclusion: EACC surgery through the external ear canal under a dedicated endoscope is a safe, reliable, and effective method. Patients with stage I and II external auditory canal cholesteatoma surgery under endoscopy have a rapid postoperative recovery with significant hearing improvement, and stage IIIA patients can also achieve good results under strict evaluation of indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.