Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246948›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2021

Delineating Corneal Elastic Anisotropy in a Porcine Model Using Noncontact OCT Elastography and Ex Vivo Mechanical Tests.

Mitchell A Kirby, John J Pitre, Hong-Cin Liou, David S Li, Ruikang K Wang, Ivan Pelivanov, Matthew O'Donnell, Tueng T Shen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mitchell A KirbyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
John J PitreDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Hong-Cin LiouDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
David S LiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Ruikang K WangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Ivan PelivanovDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Matthew O'DonnellDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Tueng T ShenDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
University of Washington · US

Funding

OPTICAL MICROANGIOGRAHY OF CEREBROVASCULAR PERFUSIONR01HL093140 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WANG, RUIKANG · 2008 to 2017
$4.2M
Dynamic OCE with acoustic micro-tapping for in vivo monitoring of skin graft surgeriesR01AR077560 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PELIVANOV, IVAN · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Optical coherence elastography of corneal dynamicsR01EY026532 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHEN, TUENG T · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
Sensitive tumor detection with magnetomotive imagingR01CA170734 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GAO, XIAOHU · 2012 to 2015
$1.8M
Non-invasive trapping and imaging of circulating tumor cells in the peripheral vaR01EB016034 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI O'DONNELL, MATTHEW · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
NON-INVASIVE REAL-TIME LABEL-FREE 3D IMAGING OF RETINAL MICROCIRCULATIONR01EY024158 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WANG, RUIKANG · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170734NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024158NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026532NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL093140NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077560NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare noncontact acoustic microtapping (AμT) OCT elastography (OCE) with destructive mechanical tests to confirm corneal elastic anisotropy. Design: Ex vivo laboratory study with noncontact AμT-OCE followed by mechanical rheometry and extensometry. Participants: Inflated cornea of whole-globe porcine eyes (n = 9). Methods: A noncontact AμT transducer was used to launch propagating mechanical waves in the cornea that were imaged with phase-sensitive OCT at physiologically relevant controlled pressures. Reconstruction of both Young's modulus ( Main Outcome Measures: Strong corneal anisotropy was confirmed with both AμT-OCE and mechanical tests, with the Young's ( Results: Mean of the OCE measured moduli were Conclusions: The cornea is confirmed to be a strongly anisotropic elastic material that cannot be characterized with a single elastic modulus. The NITI model is the simplest one that accounts for the cornea's incompressibility and in-plane distribution of lamellae. AμT-OCE has been shown to be the only reported noncontact, noninvasive method to measure both elastic moduli. Submillimeter spatial resolution and near real-time operation can be achieved. Quantifying corneal elasticity in vivo will enable significant innovation in ophthalmology, helping to develop personalized biomechanical models of the eye that can predict response to ophthalmic interventions.

Indexed as

AμT, acoustic microtappingBSS, balanced saline solutionCorneaElastic anisotropyIOP, intraocular pressureNITI modelNITI, nearly incompressible transversely isotropicOCE, OCT elastographyOCT elastographyYoung’s modulus

Identifiers

PMID36246948
PMCPMC9560544
OpenAlexW3164297379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.