ArticleOphthalmology science2021
Repeatability of Peripapillary OCT Angiography in Neurodegenerative Disease.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinal microvascular alterations in Parkinson's disease: visual analysis and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Pathological Mechanisms and Molecular Imaging Advances in Alzheimer's Disease.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Review
- Assessment of OCT and Angio-OCT Parameters in Keratoconus Patients with and without Penetrating Keratoplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Multimodal Retinal Imaging Classification for Parkinson's Disease Using a Convolutional Neural Network.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Detection of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect and Its Correlation with Structural and Functional Asymmetry in Patients with Glaucoma Using Hitomiru, a Novel Hand-Held Pupillometer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Convolutional Neural Network-Based Automated Quality Assessment of OCT and OCT Angiography Image Maps in Individuals With Neurodegenerative Disease.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Intrasession Repeatability of OCT Angiography Parameters in Neurodegenerative Disease.Ophthalmology science · 2023Article
- Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Microvasculature and Structure in Dementia With Lewy Bodies Compared With Normal Cognition.Journal of vitreoretinal diseasesArticle
- Longitudinal Assessment of Peripapillary Microvasculature Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Cognitively Normal Adults.Journal of vitreoretinal diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the repeatability of peripapillary OCT angiography (OCTA) in those with Alzheimer disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Parkinson disease (PD), or normal cognition. Design: Cross-sectional. Participants: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD, MCI, PD, or normal cognition were imaged. Those with glaucoma, diabetes mellitus, vitreoretinal pathology, and poor-quality images were excluded. Methods: Each eligible eye of each participant underwent 2 OCTA 4.5 × 4.5-mm peripapillary scans in a single session using a Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 with AngioPlex (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The Zeiss software (v11.0.0.29946) quantified measures of perfusion in the radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) plexus in 4 sectors (superior, nasal, inferior, temporal). The average of these sectors was calculated and reported. Main Outcome Measures: Radial peripapillary capillary plexus perfusion was quantified using 2 parameters: capillary perfusion density (CPD) and capillary flux index (CFI). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to quantify repeatability. For subjects who had both eyes included, the average values of each scan pair were used to assess interocular symmetry of CPD and CFI. Results: Of 374 eyes, 46 were from participants who had AD, 85 were from participants who had MCI, 87 were from participants who had PD, and 156 were from participants who had normal cognition. Capillary perfusion density ICC in AD = 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.93), MCI = 0.95 (0.92-0.96), PD = 0.91 (0.87-0.94), and controls = 0.90 (0.87-0.93). Capillary flux index ICC in AD = 0.82 (0.70-0.90), MCI = 0.87 (0.80-0.91), PD = 0.91 (0.87-0.94) and controls = 0.85 (0.79-0.89). There were no significant differences in interocular variation in average CPD and CFI in AD, MCI, or PD (all Conclusions: Peripapillary OCTA repeatability in AD, MCI, and PD is good-excellent and similar to those with normal cognition. Insignificant interocular asymmetry in peripapillary OCTA suggests neurodegeneration may proceed uniformly; future studies may reveal the appropriateness of single-eye imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.