Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246944›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2021

Federated Learning for Microvasculature Segmentation and Diabetic Retinopathy Classification of OCT Data.

Julian Lo, Timothy T Yu, Da Ma, Pengxiao Zang, Julia P Owen, Qinqin Zhang, Ruikang K Wang, Mirza Faisal Beg, Aaron Y Lee, Yali Jia and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Advances in OCT Angiography.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. A Clinician's Guide to Sharing Data for AI in Ophthalmology.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Deep learning in optical coherence tomography: Where are the gaps?Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  15. Medical Imaging Applications of Federated Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julian LoSchool of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Timothy T YuSchool of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Da MaSchool of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Pengxiao ZangCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Julia P OwenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Qinqin ZhangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Ruikang K WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Mirza Faisal BegSchool of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Aaron Y LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Yali JiaCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Marinko V SarunicSchool of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CATHERINE W MORGANS · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
OCT Angiography for Neovascular Age-related Macular DegenerationR01EY024544 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Steven T Bailey, Yali Jia · 2014 to 2026
$6.2M
Ultra-wide field optical coherence tomography based angiography for imaging diabetic retinopathyR01EY028753 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WANG, RUIKANG · 2018 to 2021
$2.2M
Wide-field and projection-resolved optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathyR01EY027833 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HWANG, THOMAS, JIA, YALI · 2017 to 2020
$1.8M
Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of diabetic macular edemaK23EY029246 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, AARON · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY029246NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024544NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027833NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a federated learning framework for deep neural network-based retinal microvasculature segmentation and referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR) classification using OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA). Design: Retrospective analysis of clinical OCT and OCTA scans of control participants and patients with diabetes. Participants: The 153 OCTA en face images used for microvasculature segmentation were acquired from 4 OCT instruments with fields of view ranging from 2 × 2-mm to 6 × 6-mm. The 700 eyes used for RDR classification consisted of OCTA en face images and structural OCT projections acquired from 2 commercial OCT systems. Methods: OCT angiography images used for microvasculature segmentation were delineated manually and verified by retina experts. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity was evaluated by retinal specialists and was condensed into 2 classes: non-RDR and RDR. The federated learning configuration was demonstrated via simulation using 4 clients for microvasculature segmentation and was compared with other collaborative training methods. Subsequently, federated learning was applied over multiple institutions for RDR classification and was compared with models trained and tested on data from the same institution (internal models) and different institutions (external models). Main Outcome Measures: For microvasculature segmentation, we measured the accuracy and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). For severity classification, we measured accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve, balanced accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For both applications, federated learning achieved similar performance as internal models. Specifically, for microvasculature segmentation, the federated learning model achieved similar performance (mean DSC across all test sets, 0.793) as models trained on a fully centralized dataset (mean DSC, 0.807). For RDR classification, federated learning achieved a mean AUROC of 0.954 and 0.960; the internal models attained a mean AUROC of 0.956 and 0.973. Similar results are reflected in the other calculated evaluation metrics. Conclusions: Federated learning showed similar results to traditional deep learning in both applications of segmentation and classification, while maintaining data privacy. Evaluation metrics highlight the potential of collaborative learning for increasing domain diversity and the generalizability of models used for the classification of OCT data.

Indexed as

API, application programming interfaceCOVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019Diabetic retinopathyDR, diabetic retinopathyDSC, Dice similarity coefficientFederated learningIRB, institutional review boardMachine learningNeural networkNRDR, non-referable diabetic retinopathyOCTOCTA, OCT angiographyOHSU, Oregon Health and Science UniversityRDR, referable diabetic retinopathySFU, Simon Fraser University

Identifiers

PMID36246944
PMCPMC9559956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.