ArticleOphthalmology science2021
Federated Learning for Microvasculature Segmentation and Diabetic Retinopathy Classification of OCT Data.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recent advances and applications of optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Multi-modal personalized federated learning with adaptive differential privacy for medical image classification and a privacy-preserving approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparing decentralized machine learning and AI clinical models to local and centralized alternatives: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Federated learning for privacy-preserving ophthalmic artificial intelligence: clinical applications and translational challenges.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Federated Deep Learning Approaches for Detecting Ocular Diseases in Medical Imaging: A Systematic Review.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Adaptive Multimodal Fusion in Vertical Federated Learning for Decentralized Glaucoma Screening.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Addressing contemporary threats in anonymised healthcare data using privacy engineering.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Advances in OCT Angiography.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Review
- Retina Fundus Photograph-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Medicine: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Review
- A Clinician's Guide to Sharing Data for AI in Ophthalmology.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Review
- Automated classification of choroidal neovascularization, diabetic macular edema, and drusen from retinal OCT images using vision transformers: a comparative study.Lasers in medical science · 2024Article
- FedEYE: A scalable and flexible end-to-end federated learning platform for ophthalmology.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Early inner plexiform layer thinning and retinal nerve fiber layer thickening in excitotoxic retinal injury using deep learning-assisted optical coherence tomography.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2024Article
- Deep learning in optical coherence tomography: Where are the gaps?Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Medical Imaging Applications of Federated Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- OCT angiography and its retinal biomarkers [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2023Review
- Automatic 3D reconstruction of an anatomically correct upper airway from endoscopic long range OCT images.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Retinal Vascular Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Federated Learning for Medical Image Analysis with Deep Neural Networks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Reviewing Federated Machine Learning and Its Use in Diseases Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a federated learning framework for deep neural network-based retinal microvasculature segmentation and referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR) classification using OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA). Design: Retrospective analysis of clinical OCT and OCTA scans of control participants and patients with diabetes. Participants: The 153 OCTA en face images used for microvasculature segmentation were acquired from 4 OCT instruments with fields of view ranging from 2 × 2-mm to 6 × 6-mm. The 700 eyes used for RDR classification consisted of OCTA en face images and structural OCT projections acquired from 2 commercial OCT systems. Methods: OCT angiography images used for microvasculature segmentation were delineated manually and verified by retina experts. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity was evaluated by retinal specialists and was condensed into 2 classes: non-RDR and RDR. The federated learning configuration was demonstrated via simulation using 4 clients for microvasculature segmentation and was compared with other collaborative training methods. Subsequently, federated learning was applied over multiple institutions for RDR classification and was compared with models trained and tested on data from the same institution (internal models) and different institutions (external models). Main Outcome Measures: For microvasculature segmentation, we measured the accuracy and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). For severity classification, we measured accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve, balanced accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For both applications, federated learning achieved similar performance as internal models. Specifically, for microvasculature segmentation, the federated learning model achieved similar performance (mean DSC across all test sets, 0.793) as models trained on a fully centralized dataset (mean DSC, 0.807). For RDR classification, federated learning achieved a mean AUROC of 0.954 and 0.960; the internal models attained a mean AUROC of 0.956 and 0.973. Similar results are reflected in the other calculated evaluation metrics. Conclusions: Federated learning showed similar results to traditional deep learning in both applications of segmentation and classification, while maintaining data privacy. Evaluation metrics highlight the potential of collaborative learning for increasing domain diversity and the generalizability of models used for the classification of OCT data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.