Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246941›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2021

TENAYA and LUCERNE: Rationale and Design for the Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Faricimab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Arshad M Khanani, Robyn H Guymer, Karen Basu, Heather Boston, Jeffrey S Heier, Jean-François Korobelnik, Aachal Kotecha, Hugh Lin, David Silverman, Balakumar Swaminathan and 3 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03823287 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (TENAYA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2019 to 2022Enrolled671ConditionsWet Macular DegenerationArmsFaricimab, Aflibercept, Sham Procedure
NCT03823300 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (LUCERNE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2019 to 2022Enrolled658ConditionsWet Macular DegenerationArmsFaricimab, Aflibercept, Sham Procedure
NCT07187804 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Long Term Efficacy of Faricimab Using a Treat and Extend Regimen for Type 3 Macular Neovascularization

TypeinterventionalSponsorKim's Eye HospitalRan2025 to 2028Enrolled30ConditionsAge-related Macular Degeneration (ARMD), Choroidal Neovascularization, Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth FactorArmsIntravitreal faricimab injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Arshad M KhananiSierra Eye Associates, Reno, Nevada.
Robyn H GuymerCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Karen BasuRoche Products (Ireland) Limited, Dublin, Ireland.
Heather BostonRoche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey S HeierOphthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jean-François KorobelnikOphthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Aachal KotechaRoche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom.
Hugh LinGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
David SilvermanRoche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom.
Balakumar SwaminathanF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey R WillisGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Young Hee YoonAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea.
Carlos Quezada-RuizGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Roche (United Kingdom) · GBAsan Medical Center · KROphthalmic Consultants of Boston · USRoche (Canada) · CARoche (Ireland) · IEThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the design and rationale of the phase 3 TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03823300) trials that aimed to assess efficacy, safety, and durability of faricimab, the first bispecific antibody for intraocular use, which independently binds and neutralizes both angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) versus aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Design: Identical, global, double-masked, randomized, controlled, phase 3 clinical trials. Participants: Adults with treatment-naïve nAMD. Methods: These trials were designed to evaluate patients randomized to receive faricimab 6.0 mg up to every 16 weeks after 4 initial every-4-week doses or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial every-4-week doses. The initial doses in the faricimab arm were followed by individualized fixed treatment intervals up to week 60, based on disease activity assessment at weeks 20 and 24, guided by central subfield thickness, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and investigator assessment. The primary efficacy end point was BCVA change from baseline averaged over weeks 40, 44, and 48. Secondary end points included the proportion of patients receiving every-8-week, every-12-week, and every-16-week faricimab and anatomic outcomes. Safety outcomes included incidence and severity of ocular and nonocular adverse events. From week 60, faricimab-treated patients followed a personalized treatment interval (PTI), a novel protocol-driven treat-and-extend regimen with interval adjustment from every 8 weeks to every 16 weeks based on individualized treatment response measured by anatomic criteria, functional criteria, and investigator assessment of patients' disease activity. Main Outcome Measures: Rationale for trial design and PTI approach. Results: The TENAYA and LUCERNE trials were the first registrational trials in nAMD to test fixed dosing regimens up to every 16 weeks based on patients' disease activity in year 1 and incorporate a PTI paradigm during year 2. The PTI approach was designed to tailor treatment intervals to individual patient needs, to reflect clinical practice treatment practice, and to reduce treatment burden. Conclusions: The innovative trial design rationale for the TENAYA and LUCERNE trials included maximizing the benefits of angiopoietin-2 blockade through dosing up to every 16 weeks and PTI regimens based on patients' disease activity while fulfilling health authority requirements for potential registrational efforts.

Indexed as

Anti-VEGF therapyBCVA, best-corrected visual acuityCNV, choroidal neovascularizationCRC, central reading centerCST, central subfield thicknessFaricimabFFA, fundus fluorescein angiographynAMD, neovascular age-related macular degenerationNeovascular age-related macular degenerationPersonalized treatment intervalPTI, personalized treatment intervalT&E, treat-and-extendVEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID36246941
PMCPMC9559073
OpenAlexW3211644911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.