Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246865›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2022

Multicriteria decision frontiers for prescription anomaly detection over time.

Babak Zafari, Tahir Ekin, Fabrizio Ruggeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Babak ZafariMathematics and Science Division, Babson College, Babson Park, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6731-1661
Tahir EkinMcCoy College of Business, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
Fabrizio RuggeriCNR-IMATI, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care prescription fraud and abuse result in major financial losses and adverse health effects. The growing budget deficits of health insurance programs and recent opioid drug abuse crisis in the United States have accelerated the use of analytical methods. Unsupervised methods such as clustering and anomaly detection could help the health care auditors to evaluate the billing patterns when embedded into rule-based frameworks. These decision models can aid policymakers in detecting potential suspicious activities. This manuscript proposes an unsupervised temporal learning-based decision frontier model using the real world Medicare Part D prescription data collected over 5 years. First, temporal probabilistic hidden groups of drugs are retrieved using a structural topic model with covariates. Next, we construct combined concentration curves and Gini measures considering the weighted impact of temporal observations for prescription patterns, in addition to the Gini values for the cost. The novel decision frontier utilizes this output and enables health care practitioners to assess the trade-offs among different criteria and to identify audit leads.

Indexed as

decision modelshealth care fraudMedicare Part DMultivariate anomaly detectionprescription patternstopic model

Identifiers

PMID36246865
PMCPMC9559334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.