ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
A comparative study on the efficacy of robot of stereotactic assistant and frame-assisted stereotactic drilling, drainage for intracerebral hematoma in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of The Robotic Stereotactic Assistance for intracerebral hemorrhage; A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Pedal to the metal: accelerating intracerebral hemorrhage treatment with robotic-assisted surgery. A systematic review & meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of ROSA vs. conventional therapy for intracerebral hemorrhage.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Evolving Therapeutic Landscape of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Emerging Cutting-Edge Advancements in Surgical Robots, Regenerative Medicine, and Neurorehabilitation Techniques.Translational stroke research · 2025Review
- A comparative study of robot-assisted and manual pore cranial drilling and drainage for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Robot assisted stereotactic surgery improves hematoma evacuation in intracerebral hemorrhage compared to frame based method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effect of early stepwise controlled decompression combined with mild hypothermia therapy on efficacy, cerebral edema volume, and serum biochemical indices in patients with severe hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Drilling Drainage Surgery in Patients with Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Development of a Predictive Nomogram.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Curative effect analysis of robot-assisted drainage surgery in treatment of spontaneous hypertensive brainstem hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Surgical Robotics for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Treatment: State of the Art and Future Directions.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the clinical efficacy of robot of stereotactic assistant (ROSA) and frame-assisted stereotactic drilling and drainage for intracerebral hematoma in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). Methods: A total of 142 patients with HICH treated in Baoding First Central Hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were selected and divided into two groups using a random number table. The ROSA group was treated with a robot of stereotactic assistant, while the frame group underwent frame-assisted stereotactic drilling and drainage for intracerebral hematoma. Surgical duration, postoperative extubation time and complications were compared between the two groups. Venous blood (5 mL) was collected before and three days after surgery. The levels of inflammatory factors [tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)], as well as neurological function indexes [neuron-specific enolase (NSE), nerve growth factor (NGF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)] were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: The surgical duration, postoperative extubation time, and incidences of infection and postoperative rehemorrhage in the ROSA group were lower than those in the frame group ( Conclusion: Compared with frame-assisted stereotactic drilling and drainage for intracerebral hematoma, ROSA in HICH treatment shortens the surgical duration and postoperative extubation time, reduces the risks of infection and rehemorrhage and decreases inflammatory level, which is helpful for the recovery of neurological function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.