Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246543›Full record

ArticleEarth's future2022

How Much Food Can We Grow in Urban Areas? Food Production and Crop Yields of Urban Agriculture: A Meta-Analysis.

Florian Thomas Payen, Daniel L Evans, Natalia Falagán, Charlotte A Hardman, Sofia Kourmpetli, Lingxuan Liu, Rachel Marshall, Bethan R Mead, Jessica A C Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Earth's future, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Projected Climate Vulnerability ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Florian Thomas PayenLancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0147-7057
Daniel L EvansCentre for Soil, Agrifood and Biosciences Cranfield University Cranfield UK.
Natalia FalagánCentre for Soil, Agrifood and Biosciences Cranfield University Cranfield UK.
Charlotte A HardmanDepartment of Psychology University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Sofia KourmpetliCentre for Soil, Agrifood and Biosciences Cranfield University Cranfield UK.
Lingxuan LiuLancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UK.
Rachel MarshallLancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UK.
Bethan R MeadDepartment of Psychology University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Jessica A C DaviesLancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban agriculture can contribute to food security, food system resilience and sustainability at the city level. While studies have examined urban agricultural productivity, we lack systemic knowledge of how agricultural productivity of urban systems compares to conventional agriculture and how productivity varies for different urban spaces (e.g., allotments vs. rooftops vs. indoor farming) and growing systems (e.g., hydroponics vs. soil-based agriculture). Here, we present a global meta-analysis that seeks to quantify crop yields of urban agriculture for a broad range of crops and explore differences in yields for distinct urban spaces and growing systems. We found 200 studies reporting urban crop yields, from which 2,062 observations were extracted. Lettuces and chicories were the most studied urban grown crops. We observed high agronomic suitability of urban areas, with urban agricultural yields on par with or greater than global average conventional agricultural yields. "Cucumbers and gherkins" was the category of crops for which differences in yields between urban and conventional agriculture were the greatest (17 kg m

Indexed as

agricultural productivityfood securitygrowing systemsurban food growingurban resilienceurban spaces

Identifiers

PMID36246543
PMCPMC9540868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.