ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Comparison of degradation behavior and osseointegration of 3D powder-printed calcium magnesium phosphate cement scaffolds with alkaline or acid post-treatment.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vivo Degradation Behaviour and Osteoregenerative Capacity of 3D-Printed Magnesium Phosphate and Calcium Magnesium Phosphate Cement Scaffolds.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Histomorphometric Assessment of Non-Decalcified Plastic-Embedded Specimens for Evaluation of Bone Regeneration Using Bone Substitute Materials-A Systematic Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Multiparametric influence of 3D-printed organo-mineral scaffolds on bone regeneration.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- In Vivo Investigation of 3D-Printed Calcium Magnesium Phosphate Wedges in Partial Load Defects.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the positive effects of magnesium substitution on the mechanical properties and the degradation rate of the clinically well-established calcium phosphate cements (CPCs), calcium magnesium phosphate cements (CMPCs) are increasingly being researched as bone substitutes. A post-treatment alters the materials' physical properties and chemical composition, reinforcing the structure and modifying the degradation rate. By alkaline post-treatment with diammonium hydrogen phosphate (DAHP, (NH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.