Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246344›Full record

ArticleRegulation & governance2022

The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments.

Tom Christensen, Mads Dagnis Jensen, Michael Kluth, Gunnar Helgi Kristinsson, Kennet Lynggaard, Per Lægreid, Risto Niemikari, Jon Pierre, Tapio Raunio, Gústaf Adolf Skúlason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regulation & governance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tom ChristensenDepartment of Political Science University of Oslo Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-9243
Mads Dagnis JensenDepartment of International Economics, Government and Business Copenhagen Business School Frederiksberg Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4226-4114
Michael KluthDepartment of Social Sciences and Business Roskilde University Roskilde Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-8409
Gunnar Helgi KristinssonFaculty of Political Science University of Iceland Reykjavík Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1579-1370
Kennet LynggaardDepartment of Social Sciences and Business Roskilde University Roskilde Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-5371
Per LægreidDepartment of Government University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-4275
Risto NiemikariFaculty of Management and Business Tampere Universities Tampere Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2603-3965
Jon PierreDepartment of Political Science University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1523-3603
Tapio RaunioFaculty of Management and Business Tampere Universities Tampere Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-7182
Gústaf Adolf SkúlasonFaculty of Political Science University of Iceland Reykjavík Iceland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Government responses to the Covid-19 pandemic in the Nordic states-Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden-exhibit similarities and differences. This article investigates the extent to which crisis policymaking diverges from normal policymaking

Indexed as

Covid‐19expertisegovernanceNordic statespoliticizationregulation

Identifiers

PMID36246344
PMCPMC9538262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.