Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246230›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022

Concepts and conjectures concerning predatory performance of myxobacteria.

Kayleigh E Phillips, Shukria Akbar, D Cole Stevens

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Lysis profile and preference ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kayleigh E PhillipsDepartment of BioMolecular Sciences, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, United States.
Shukria AkbarDivision of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
D Cole StevensDepartment of BioMolecular Sciences, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, United States.
University of Mississippi · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Tracking Glycosylation State with Fluorinated Glycosides ProbesP20GM130460 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI · PI Joshua S Sharp · 2020 to 2026
$17.9M
Myxobacterial predatory antimicrobial production in response to quorum sensing signal interceptionR15AI137996 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI · PI STEVENS, DAVID COLE · 2019 to 2019
$422k
NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI137996NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myxobacteria are excellent model organisms for investigation of predator-prey interactions and predatory shaping of microbial communities. This review covers interdisciplinary topics related to myxobacterial predation and provides current concepts and challenges for determining predatory performance. Discussed topics include the role of specialized metabolites during predation, genetic determinants for predatory performance, challenges associated with methodological differences, discrepancies between sequenced and environmental myxobacteria, and factors that influence predation.

Indexed as

microbial community structuremyxobacteriapredationpredator–preyspecialized metabolism

Identifiers

PMID36246230
PMCPMC9556981
OpenAlexW4298003792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.