Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246209›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

An improved luciferase immunosorbent assay for ultrasensitive detection of antibodies against African swine fever virus.

Qiongjie Wang, Zhancheng Tian, Jifei Yang, Shandian Gao, Junzheng Du, Hongge Zhang, Zhonghui Zhang, Guiquan Guan, Qingli Niu, Hong Yin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiongjie WangAfrican Swine Fever Regional Laboratory of China (Lanzhou), State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Zhancheng TianAfrican Swine Fever Regional Laboratory of China (Lanzhou), State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Jifei YangAfrican Swine Fever Regional Laboratory of China (Lanzhou), State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Shandian GaoAfrican Swine Fever Regional Laboratory of China (Lanzhou), State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Junzheng DuAfrican Swine Fever Regional Laboratory of China (Lanzhou), State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Hongge ZhangAfrican Swine Fever Regional Laboratory of China (Lanzhou), State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Zhonghui ZhangAfrican Swine Fever Regional Laboratory of China (Lanzhou), State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Guiquan GuanAfrican Swine Fever Regional Laboratory of China (Lanzhou), State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Qingli NiuAfrican Swine Fever Regional Laboratory of China (Lanzhou), State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Hong YinAfrican Swine Fever Regional Laboratory of China (Lanzhou), State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNLanzhou Veterinary Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF), caused by African swine fever virus (ASFV), is a fatal infectious disease of pigs and causes great socioeconomic losses globally. The reliable diagnostic method is critical for prevention and control of the disease. In this study, an improved Luciferase immunosorbent assay (LISA) for detecting ASF was developed using the cell lysates containing ASFV p35 protein fused with a reporter Nano-luciferase (p35-Luc protein). The improved method avoids the complicate procedures of immobilizing the serum samples with protein G in the normal LISA method, and replaced by directly coating the serum samples with carbonate buffer, therefore reduces the productive cost and simplifies the operation procedures. The p35-Luc LISA exhibited high specificity for anti-ASFV sera while no cross-reactions with the sera against other swine viruses. The detection limit of the p35-Luc LISA was shown to be at least four times higher than that of the p35 based indirect ELISA established in our lab. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed the 96.36% relative specificity and 96.97% relative sensitivity of the p35-Luc LISA with the cutoff values of 3.55 as compared to the commercial Ingezim p72-ELISA kit. Furthermore, a total of 248 serum samples were tested by both the p35-Luc LISA and commercial Ingezim p72-ELISA kit, and there was a high degree of agreement (97.6%, kappa = 0.9753) in the performance of the two assays. Collectively, the improved LISA based on the p35-Luc protein could be used as a rapid, ultrasensitive, cost-effective and reliable diagnostic tool for serological survey of ASF in pig farms.

Indexed as

African swine fever virus (ASFV)improved diagnostic toolluciferase immunosorbent assay (LISA)p35-Lucsera

Identifiers

PMID36246209
PMCPMC9557169
OpenAlexW4298001332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.