Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246187›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2022

Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Elamipretide in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration and High-Risk Drusen: ReCLAIM High-Risk Drusen Study.

Michael J Allingham, Priyatham S Mettu, Scott W Cousins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. 2025 FDA TIDES (Peptides and Oligonucleotides) Harvest.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Neuroprotection beyond intraocular pressure: game changer or quiet addiction.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J AllinghamDuke Center for Macular Diseases, Department of Ophthalmology, Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Priyatham S MettuDuke Center for Macular Diseases, Department of Ophthalmology, Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Scott W CousinsDuke Center for Macular Diseases, Department of Ophthalmology, Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess safety, tolerability, and feasibility of subcutaneous administration of the mitochondrial-targeted drug elamipretide in patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and high-risk drusen (HRD) and to perform exploratory analyses of change in visual function. Design: Phase 1, single-center, open-label, 24-week clinical trial with preplanned HRD cohort. Participants: Adult patients ≥55 years of age with intermediate AMD and HRD. Methods: Participants received subcutaneous elamipretide 40 mg daily, with safety and tolerability assessed throughout the study. Ocular assessments included normal-luminance best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance best-corrected visual acuity (LLVA), normal-luminance binocular reading acuity (NLRA), low-luminance binocular reading acuity (LLRA), spectral-domain OCT, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), mesopic microperimetry, dark adaptation, and low-luminance questionnaire (LLQ). Main Outcome Measures: The primary end point was safety and tolerability. Prespecified exploratory end points included changes from baseline in BCVA, LLVA, NLRA, LLRA, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-drusen complex (DC) volume by OCT, FAF, mesopic microperimetry, dark adaptation, and LLQ results. Results: Subcutaneous administration of elamipretide was highly feasible. All participants with HRD (n = 21) experienced 1 or more adverse events (AEs), but all were mild (57%) or moderate (43%), with the most common events related to injection site reactions. No serious systemic AEs occurred. One participant discontinued because of injection site reaction, 1 participant withdrew because they did not wish to continue study visits, and 1 participant withdrew after experiencing transient visual impairment. Among the 18 participants who completed the study, mean change in BCVA from baseline to 24 weeks was +3.6 letters ( Conclusions: Elamipretide appeared to be generally safe and well tolerated in treating intermediate AMD and HRD. Exploratory analyses demonstrate a positive effect on visual function, particularly under low-luminance conditions. Further study of elamipretide for treatment of intermediate AMD with HRD is warranted.

Indexed as

AE, adverse eventAMD, age-related macular degenerationBCVA, best-corrected visual acuityDC, drusen complexDry age-related macular degenerationElamipretideFAF, fundus autofluorescenceGA, geographic atrophyHRD, high-risk drusenLLQ, low-luminance questionnaireLLRA, low-luminance binocular reading acuityLLVA, low-luminance best-corrected visual acuitylogMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolutionMitochondrial dysfunctionNCGA, noncentral, fovea-sparing geographic atrophyNLRA, normal-luminance binocular reading acuityPhase 1 clinical trialRetinaRPE, retinal pigment epitheliumSD, standard deviation

Identifiers

PMID36246187
PMCPMC9560633
OpenAlexW4200104785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.