Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246173›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2022

Volumetric Measurement of Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Masslike Structures in Patients with Optic Disc Drusen.

Morten Jørgensen, Lasse Malmqvist, Alexander E Hansen, J Alexander Fraser, Steffen Hamann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structure (PHOMS) and optic disc drusen in pediatric pseudo-papilledema.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Morten JørgensenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Lasse MalmqvistDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
Alexander E HansenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
J Alexander FraserDepartments of Clinical Neurological Sciences and Ophthalmology, Western University, London, Canada.
Steffen HamannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a method to determine the volume of peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid masslike structures (PHOMS) and to examine the correlation between PHOMS and anatomic optic nerve head characteristics in a large cohort of patients with optic disc drusen (ODD). Design: Retrospective, observational study of patients with ODD. Participants: Patients with ODD seen in a 3-year period. Methods: We determined the prevalence of PHOMS. We then developed a method to calculate the volume of PHOMS and measured this in all patients where radial scans on OCT were available. We analyzed the correlation between PHOMS volume and patient age, size of Bruch's membrane opening (BMO), ODD visibility, and anatomic location of ODD in the optic nerve. Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence and characteristics of PHOMS in patients with ODD. Results: In 247 (77%) eyes with ODD, PHOMS were found. Among these, 80% were in the first decade of life, 87% were in the second decade, 89% were in the third decade, 85% were in the fourth decade, 74% were in the fifth decade, 73% were in the sixth decade, 58% were in the seventh decade, 40% were in the eighth decade, and 0% were in the ninth decade. The ophthalmoscopic visibility of ODD increased with age. The volume of PHOMS decreased with age, but with no correlation to the size of BMO. The median volume of PHOMS was 0.27 mm Conclusions: In patients with ODD, PHOMS are seen frequently, with the highest prevalence in younger individuals. The volume of PHOMS decreases with age, and PHOMS are seen more frequently in patients with superficial ODD.

Indexed as

BMO, Bruch’s membrane openingEDI, enhanced depth imagingIQR, interquartile rangeNAAION, nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathyOCTODD, optic disc drusenOptic disc drusenOptic nerve anatomyOptic nerve head drusenPeripapillary hyperreflective ovoid masslike structurePHOMSPHOMS, peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid masslike structure(s)Volumetric measurement

Identifiers

PMID36246173
PMCPMC9562331
OpenAlexW4200470130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.